Literature DB >> 12667529

When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.

Rebecca M Kwok1, Oliver J Braddick.   

Abstract

This study used the Titchener Circles illusion to investigate the functional dissociation of the dorsal visuomotor and ventral perceptual systems. In order to investigate the visual requirements for an action to be driven by the dorsal stream, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) targets were compared. Thirteen subjects made visual open loop manual estimations or grasping actions towards 2D and 3D versions of the illusion. No illusion effect was found for immediate grasping, but the illusion did influence manual estimation, irrespective of whether the target was 2D or 3D. It is suggested that the underlying representations used to drive grasping actions towards 2D targets are fundamentally the same as those used to drive natural grasping actions. While stereoscopically specified depth may be important to the dorsal visuomotor system, it does not appear to be necessary in order for an action to be based on dorsal representations. It is suggested that an action must be goal directed in order for that action to be driven by dorsal stream processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667529     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00324-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Similar effects of a motion-in-depth illusion on manual tracking and perceptual judgements.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; James Danckert; Britt Anderson; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Stephanie Hosang; Jillian Chan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of the Ebbinghaus figure on grasping are not only due to misjudged size.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Marianne Biegstraaten; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Is simple reaction time affected by visual illusions?

Authors:  Irene Sperandio; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.