Literature DB >> 12012164

Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.

David A Westwood1, James Danckert, Philip Servos, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

Visually guided prehension is controlled by a specialized visuomotor system in the posterior parietal cortex. It is not clear how this system responds to visual stimuli that lack three-dimensional (3D) structure, such as two-dimensional (2D) images of objects. We asked a neurological patient with visual-form agnosia (patient D.F.) to grasp 3D objects and 2D images of the same objects and to estimate their sizes manually. D.F.'s grip aperture was scaled to the sizes of the 2D and 3D target stimuli, but her manual estimates were poorly correlated with object size. Control participants demonstrated appropriate size-scaling in both the grasping and manual size-estimation tasks, but tended to use a smaller peak aperture when reaching to grasp 2D images. We conclude that: (1) the dorsal stream grasping system does not discriminate in a fundamental way between 2D and 3D objects, and (2) neurologically normal participants might adopt a different visuomotor strategy for target objects that are recognized to be ungraspable. These findings are consistent with the view that the dorsal grasping system accesses a pragmatic, spatial representation of the target object, whereas the ventral system accesses a more comprehensive, volumetric description of the object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012164     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1068-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Getting a grip on illusions: replicating Stöttinger et al [Exp Brain Res (2010) 202:79-88] results with 3-D objects.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; James Danckert; Britt Anderson; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Stephanie Hosang; Jillian Chan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Division of labour within the visual system: fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?

Authors:  Elisabeth Stöttinger; Kathrin Soder; Jürgen Pfusterschmied; Herbert Wagner; Josef Perner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual control of action directed toward two-dimensional objects relies on holistic processing of object shape.

Authors:  Erez Freud; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

7.  Online processing of shape information for control of grasping.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Automatic adjustments toward unseen visual targets during grasping movements.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.