Literature DB >> 28280878

Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.

Matthew Heath1, Joseph Manzone2.   

Abstract

The manual estimation task requires that participants separate the distance between their thumb and forefinger until they perceive it to match the size of a target object. Ganel and colleagues (Curr Biol 18:R599-R601, 2008a) demonstrated that manual estimations yield just-noticeable-difference (JND) scores that linearly increased with increasing target object size; that is, responses adhered to Weber's law and thus evince response mediation via relative and perception-based visual information. In turn, more recent work has reported that the size of a target object influences whether JNDs provide a reliable metric for evaluating the nature of the visual information supporting manual estimations. In particular, Bruno et al. (Neuropsychologia 91:327-334, 2016) reported that JNDs for 'large' target objects (i.e., 80 and 120 mm) violate Weber's law due to biomechanical limits in aperture opening. It is, however, important to recognize that the absolute size of the 'large' target objects employed by Bruno et al. may have exceeded some participants' functional aperture separation and resulted in a biomechanical strategy serving as the only viable response mode. Hence, the present investigation employed a manual estimation task wherein target object sizes were proportionately matched to decile increments (i.e., 10, 20, …, 70 and 80%) of individual participants' maximal aperture separation. Results showed that JNDs increased linearly with increasing target object size. Accordingly, we propose that manual estimations of target objects within a functionally 'graspable' range adhere to Weber's law and are mediated via relative and perception-based visual information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Just-noticeable-difference; Manual estimation; Perception; Vision; Weber’s law

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28280878     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4913-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Grasping Weber's law.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Grasping an illusion.

Authors:  E Daprati; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  An Inverse Grip Starting Posture Gives Rise to Time-Dependent Adherence to Weber's Law: A Reply to Ganel et al. (2014).

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Scott A Holmes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Stephanie Hosang; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Weber's law in tactile grasping and manual estimation: feedback-dependent evidence for functionally distinct processing streams.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Scott A Holmes; Ali Mulla; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  On the response function and range dependence of manual estimation.

Authors:  Karl K Kopiske; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Joseph Manzone; Michaela Khan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bimanual grasping does not adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Tzvi Ganel; Gal Namdar; Avigail Mirsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.