Literature DB >> 25796409

Memory delay and haptic feedback influence the dissociation of tactile cues for perception and action.

Shirin Davarpanah Jazi1, Stephanie Hosang2, Matthew Heath3.   

Abstract

The somatosensory processing model (SPM) asserts that dissociable cortical processing streams mediate tactile perceptions and actions via relative and absolute cues, respectively (Dijkerman and de Haan, 2007). Accordingly, we sought to determine whether the introduction of a memory delay and/or physically touching a target object (i.e., haptic feedback) differentially influences the cues supporting tactile perceptions and actions. Participants used their right hand to manually estimate (i.e., perceptual task) or grasp (i.e., action task) differently sized objects placed on the palm of their left limb in conditions wherein the target object was available for the duration of the response (i.e., closed-loop condition), or was removed prior to response cuing (i.e., memory-guided condition). As well, trials were performed in conditions wherein the physical object was available (i.e., haptic feedback) or unavailable (i.e., no haptic feedback) to touch. Notably, we computed just-noticeable-difference (JND) scores to determine whether the aforementioned tasks and conditions adhered to - or violated - the relative properties of Weber's law. JNDs for manual estimations adhered to Weber's law across each condition - a finding supporting the SPM's contention that an immutable and relative percept supports tactile perceptions. In turn, JNDs for grasping violated Weber's law only when haptic feedback was available. Such a finding indicates that haptic feedback supports the absolute calibration between a tactile defined object and the required motor output. What is more, our study highlights that multiple somatosensory cues (i.e., tactile and haptic) support goal-directed grasping.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feedback; Grasping; Haptic; Memory delay; Perception; Tactile

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25796409     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Stephanie Hosang; Jillian Chan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual estimations of functionally graspable target objects adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Joseph Manzone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Jillian Chan; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Michelle Yau; David A Westwood; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Joseph Manzone; Michaela Khan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grasping Weber's Law in a Virtual Environment: The Effect of Haptic Feedback.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-19

8.  Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.