Literature DB >> 28070622

Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.

Jillian Chan1, Matthew Heath2,3.   

Abstract

Relative visual information has been shown to mediate grasping responses directed to an area previously occupied by a target object (i.e., pantomime-grasping) and is an information type functionally distinct from the absolute visual information supporting naturalistic grasping (i.e., grasping a physical target). Pantomime- and naturalistic grasps differ not only in terms of their visual properties, but also because the former lacks physical interaction with a target object (i.e., no-haptic feedback). The absence of haptic feedback may represent a reason why pantomime- and naturalistic grasps differ. To address this issue, participants completed pantomime-grasps to objects embedded in fins-in and fins-out configurations of the Müller-Lyer (ML) illusion following a 2000-ms visual delay when haptic feedback was unavailable (H- condition), and when experimentally induced (H+ condition). In particular, in the H+ condition the experimenter placed a physical target object between participants' thumb and forefinger after they completed their grasping response. H- and H+ conditions were performed when online vision was available (i.e., Experiment 1) and when withdrawn (i.e., Experiment 2). If haptic feedback influences grasping, then the absolute information afforded from physically touching a target object (i.e., the H+ condition) should result in aperture metrics that are refractory-or attenuated-to the relative properties of the ML figures. Grip apertures in H- and H+ conditions were "tricked" in a direction consistent with the perceptual effects of the ML illusion; however, Experiment 2 showed that illusory effects were attenuated in the H+ condition. In other words, responses without online vision showed evidence of a visuo-haptic calibration. These results provide convergent evidence that haptic and visual feedback play a salient role in considering the extant literature's documented report of kinematic differences between pantomime- and naturalistic grasps.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grasping; Haptic feedback; Müller–Lyer figures; Pantomime; Visuomotor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28070622     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4860-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

Review 1.  From objects to names: a cognitive neuroscience approach.

Authors:  G W Humphreys; C J Price; M J Riddoch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  The effects of landmarks on the performance of delayed and real-time pointing movements.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  An Inverse Grip Starting Posture Gives Rise to Time-Dependent Adherence to Weber's Law: A Reply to Ganel et al. (2014).

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Scott A Holmes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.

Authors:  D A Westwood; T McEachern; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Multisensory integration in dynamical behaviors: maximum likelihood estimation across bimanual skill learning.

Authors:  Renaud Ronsse; R Chris Miall; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gaze anchoring guides real but not pantomime reach-to-grasp: support for the action-perception theory.

Authors:  Jessica R Kuntz; Jenni M Karl; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.