Literature DB >> 26494381

Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Michael C Hout, Hayward J Godwin, Gemma Fitzsimmons, Arryn Robbins, Tamaryn Menneer, Stephen D Goldinger.   

Abstract

Visual search is one of the most widely studied topics in vision science, both as an independent topic of interest, and as a tool for studying attention and visual cognition. A wide literature exists that seeks to understand how people find things under varying conditions of difficulty and complexity, and in situations ranging from the mundane (e.g., looking for one's keys) to those with significant societal importance (e.g., baggage or medical screening). A primary determinant of the ease and probability of success during search are the similarity relationships that exist in the search environment, such as the similarity between the background and the target, or the likeness of the non-targets to one another. A sense of similarity is often intuitive, but it is seldom quantified directly. This presents a problem in that similarity relationships are imprecisely specified, limiting the capacity of the researcher to examine adequately their influence. In this article, we present a novel approach to overcoming this problem that combines multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analyses with behavioral and eye-tracking measurements. We propose a method whereby MDS can be repurposed to successfully quantify the similarity of experimental stimuli, thereby opening up theoretical questions in visual search and attention that cannot currently be addressed. These quantifications, in conjunction with behavioral and oculomotor measures, allow for critical observations about how similarity affects performance, information selection, and information processing. We provide a demonstration and tutorial of the approach, identify documented examples of its use, discuss how complementary computer vision methods could also be adopted, and close with a discussion of potential avenues for future application of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26494381      PMCID: PMC5523409          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-1010-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  92 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; P Verghese; M Pavel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Determining the Dimensionality of Multidimensional Scaling Representations for Cognitive Modeling.

Authors:  Michael D. Lee
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Analysis of proximities as a technique for the study of information processing in man.

Authors:  R N SHEPARD
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1963-02       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  How a cognitive psychologist came to seek universal laws.

Authors:  Roger N Shepard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

5.  Numerical distance effects in visual search.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Anne-Kathrin Eiselt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; D L Medin; D Gentner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity.

Authors:  Tamaryn Menneer; Kyle R Cave; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-06

9.  Eye can read your mind: decoding gaze fixations to reveal categorical search targets.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-11-12
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Facial expressions can be categorized along the upper-lower facial axis, from a perceptual perspective.

Authors:  Chao Ma; Nianxin Guo; Faraday Davies; Yantian Hou; Suyan Guo; Xun Zhu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.

Authors:  Geoffrey L McKinley; Daniel J Peterson
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-10-22

4.  Flexible target templates improve visual search accuracy for faces depicting emotion.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Jason Haberman; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.

Authors:  Jeongmi Lee; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Michael C Hout; Katrín J Alexdóttir; Stephen C Walenchok; Anthony S Barnhart
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Role of dopamine and gray matter density in aging effects and individual differences of functional connectomes.

Authors:  Benjamín Garzón; Martin Lövdén; Lieke de Boer; Jan Axelsson; Katrine Riklund; Lars Bäckman; Lars Nyberg; Marc Guitart-Masip
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.270

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.