Literature DB >> 33759116

Facial expressions can be categorized along the upper-lower facial axis, from a perceptual perspective.

Chao Ma1, Nianxin Guo1, Faraday Davies2, Yantian Hou1, Suyan Guo1, Xun Zhu3.   

Abstract

A critical question, fundamental for building models of emotion, is how to categorize emotions. Previous studies have typically taken one of two approaches: (a) they focused on the pre-perceptual visual cues, how salient facial features or configurations were displayed; or (b) they focused on the post-perceptual affective experiences, how emotions affected behavior. In this study, we attempted to group emotions at a peri-perceptual processing level: it is well known that humans perceive different facial expressions differently, therefore, can we classify facial expressions into distinct categories in terms of their perceptual similarities? Here, using a novel non-lexical paradigm, we assessed the perceptual dissimilarities between 20 facial expressions using reaction times. Multidimensional-scaling analysis revealed that facial expressions were organized predominantly along the upper-lower face axis. Cluster analysis of behavioral data delineated three superordinate categories, and eye-tracking measurements validated these clustering results. Interestingly, these superordinate categories can be conceptualized according to how facial displays interact with acoustic communications: One group comprises expressions that have salient mouth features. They likely link to species-specific vocalization, for example, crying, laughing. The second group comprises visual displays with diagnosing features in both the mouth and the eye regions. They are not directly articulable but can be expressed prosodically, for example, sad, angry. Expressions in the third group are also whole-face expressions but are completely independent of vocalization, and likely being blends of two or more elementary expressions. We propose a theoretical framework to interpret the tripartite division in which distinct expression subsets are interpreted as successive phases in an evolutionary chain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Emotion; Face perception; Facial expression

Year:  2021        PMID: 33759116     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02281-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  44 in total

1.  A principal component analysis of facial expressions.

Authors:  A J Calder; A M Burton; P Miller; A W Young; S Akamatsu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Are there basic emotions?

Authors:  P Ekman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  The facial expression musculature in primates and its evolutionary significance.

Authors:  Anne M Burrows
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Do facial expressions signal specific emotions? Judging emotion from the face in context.

Authors:  J M Carroll; J A Russell
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-02

5.  Hemiregional variations in facial expression of emotions.

Authors:  H S Asthana; M K Mandal
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1997-08

6.  The resolution of facial expressions of emotion.

Authors:  Shichuan Du; Aleix M Martinez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Amygdala damage impairs emotional memory for gist but not details of complex stimuli.

Authors:  Ralph Adolphs; Daniel Tranel; Tony W Buchanan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-27       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  From affective blindsight to emotional consciousness.

Authors:  Alessia Celeghin; Beatrice de Gelder; Marco Tamietto
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2015-06-06

9.  Compound facial expressions of emotion.

Authors:  Shichuan Du; Yong Tao; Aleix M Martinez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Unimpaired discrimination of fearful prosody after amygdala lesion.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; René Hurlemann; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.