Literature DB >> 36271974

Using objective measures to examine the effect of suspect-filler similarity on eyewitness identification performance.

Geoffrey L McKinley1, Daniel J Peterson2.   

Abstract

When selecting fillers to include in a police lineup, one must consider the level of similarity between the suspect and potential fillers. In order to reduce misidentifications, an innocent suspect should not stand out. Therefore, it is important that the fillers share some degree of similarity. Importantly, increasing suspect-filler similarity too much will render the task too difficult reducing correct identifications of a guilty suspect. Determining how much similarity yields optimal identification performance is the focus of the proposed study. Extant research on lineup construction has provided somewhat mixed results. In part, this is likely because similarity is often defined in relative terms due to the subjective nature of similarity. In the current study, we propose an experiment in which we manipulate suspect-filler similarity via a multidimensional scaling model constructed using objective facial measurements. In doing so, we test the "propitious heterogeneity" and the diagnostic-feature-detection hypotheses which predict an advantage of lineups with low similarity fillers in terms of discriminability.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eyewitness memory; Lineup construction; Multidimensional scaling; Similarity

Year:  2022        PMID: 36271974     DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00442-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic        ISSN: 2365-7464


  23 in total

1.  Selecting foils for identification lineups: matching suspects or descriptions?

Authors:  J L Tunnicliff; S E Clark
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2000-04

2.  Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: testing the face-space framework.

Authors:  K Lee; G Byatt; G Rhodes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

Review 3.  From the lab to the police station. A successful application of eyewitness research.

Authors:  G L Wells; R S Malpass; R C Lindsay; R P Fisher; J W Turtle; S M Fulero
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-06

4.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Heather D Flowe; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2012-12

5.  The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention.

Authors:  Matthew A Palmer; Neil Brewer; Nathan Weber; Ambika Nagesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2013-03

Review 6.  Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology.

Authors:  Ryan J Fitzgerald; Chris Oriet; Heather L Price
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2014-06-23

7.  Multidimensional scaling reveals two dimensions of thermal pain.

Authors:  W C Clark; J D Carroll; J C Yang; M N Janal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance.

Authors:  G Rhodes
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Memory for faces: encoding and retrieval operations.

Authors:  G L Wells; B Hryciw
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-07

10.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.