Literature DB >> 34089167

Avoiding potential pitfalls in visual search and eye-movement experiments: A tutorial review.

Hayward J Godwin1, Michael C Hout2,3, Katrín J Alexdóttir4, Stephen C Walenchok5, Anthony S Barnhart6.   

Abstract

Examining eye-movement behavior during visual search is an increasingly popular approach for gaining insights into the moment-to-moment processing that takes place when we look for targets in our environment. In this tutorial review, we describe a set of pitfalls and considerations that are important for researchers - both experienced and new to the field - when engaging in eye-movement and visual search experiments. We walk the reader through the research cycle of a visual search and eye-movement experiment, from choosing the right predictions, through to data collection, reporting of methodology, analytic approaches, the different dependent variables to analyze, and drawing conclusions from patterns of results. Overall, our hope is that this review can serve as a guide, a talking point, a reflection on the practices and potential problems with the current literature on this topic, and ultimately a first step towards standardizing research practices in the field.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye movement; Tutorial review; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34089167      PMCID: PMC8460493          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02326-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  75 in total

Review 1.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation.

Authors:  Simon P Liversedge; Denis Drieghe; Xin Li; Guoli Yan; Xuejun Bai; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-19

3.  Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; Michael L Mack; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Adding depth to overlapping displays can improve visual search performance.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Tamaryn Menneer; Simon P Liversedge; Kyle R Cave; Nick S Holliman; Nick Donnelly
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Using interrupted visual displays to explore the capacity, time course, and format of fixation plans during visual search.

Authors:  Hayward J Godwin; Valerie Benson; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Eye-tracking data quality as affected by ethnicity and experimental design.

Authors:  Pieter Blignaut; Daniël Wium
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-03

9.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Is the eye-movement field confused about fixations and saccades? A survey among 124 researchers.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Diederick C Niehorster; Marcus Nyström; Richard Andersson; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.