Literature DB >> 28028199

Idiosyncratic Patterns of Representational Similarity in Prefrontal Cortex Predict Attentional Performance.

Jeongmi Lee1, Joy J Geng2.   

Abstract

The efficiency of finding an object in a crowded environment depends largely on the similarity of nontargets to the search target. Models of attention theorize that the similarity is determined by representations stored within an "attentional template" held in working memory. However, the degree to which the contents of the attentional template are individually unique and where those idiosyncratic representations are encoded in the brain are unknown. We investigated this problem using representational similarity analysis of human fMRI data to measure the common and idiosyncratic representations of famous face morphs during an identity categorization task; data from the categorization task were then used to predict performance on a separate identity search task. We hypothesized that the idiosyncratic categorical representations of the continuous face morphs would predict their distractability when searching for each target identity. The results identified that patterns of activation in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) as well as in face-selective areas in the ventral temporal cortex were highly correlated with the patterns of behavioral categorization of face morphs and search performance that were common across subjects. However, the individually unique components of the categorization behavior were reliably decoded only in right LPFC. Moreover, the neural pattern in right LPFC successfully predicted idiosyncratic variability in search performance, such that reaction times were longer when distractors had a higher probability of being categorized as the target identity. These results suggest that the prefrontal cortex encodes individually unique components of categorical representations that are also present in attentional templates for target search. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Everyone's perception of the world is uniquely shaped by personal experiences and preferences. Using functional MRI, we show that individual differences in the categorization of face morphs between two identities could be decoded from the prefrontal cortex and the ventral temporal cortex. Moreover, the individually unique representations in prefrontal cortex predicted idiosyncratic variability in attentional performance when looking for each identity in the "crowd" of another morphed face in a separate search task. Our results reveal that the representation of task-related information in prefrontal cortex is individually unique and preserved across categorization and search performance. This demonstrates the possibility of predicting individual behaviors across tasks with patterns of brain activity.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/371257-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RSA; attentional template; fMRI; individual difference; prefrontal cortex; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028199      PMCID: PMC6596852          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1407-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  D J Freedman; M Riesenhuber; T Poggio; E K Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Altering object representations through category learning.

Authors:  R L Goldstone; Y Lippa; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-01

3.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Julio C Martinez-Trujillo; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain.

Authors:  Pia Rotshtein; Richard N A Henson; Alessandro Treves; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-12       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Experience-dependent representation of visual categories in parietal cortex.

Authors:  David J Freedman; John A Assad
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Searching for camouflaged targets: effects of target-background similarity on visual search.

Authors:  Mark B Neider; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The neural bases of the short-term storage of verbal information are anatomically variable across individuals.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Giulio Tononi; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  J V Haxby; M I Gobbini; M L Furey; A Ishai; J L Schouten; P Pietrini
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Probing the Neural Mechanisms for Distractor Filtering and Their History-Contingent Modulation by Means of TMS.

Authors:  Carlotta Lega; Oscar Ferrante; Francesco Marini; Elisa Santandrea; Luigi Cattaneo; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Pattern Similarity Analyses of FrontoParietal Task Coding: Individual Variation and Genetic Influences.

Authors:  Joset A Etzel; Ya'el Courtney; Caitlin E Carey; Maria Z Gehred; Arpana Agrawal; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Role of Inferior Frontal Junction (IFJ) in the Control of Feature versus Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Sreenivasan Meyyappan; Abhijit Rajan; George R Mangun; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Neural Coding of Cognitive Control: The Representational Similarity Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Michael C Freund; Joset A Etzel; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 24.482

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.