Literature DB >> 31974937

Flexible target templates improve visual search accuracy for faces depicting emotion.

Bo-Yeong Won1, Jason Haberman2, Eliza Bliss-Moreau3,4, Joy J Geng5,6.   

Abstract

Theories of visual attention hypothesize that target selection depends upon matching visual inputs to a memory representation of the target - i.e., the target or attentional template. Most theories assume that the template contains a veridical copy of target features, but recent studies suggest that target representations may shift "off veridical" from actual target features to increase target-to-distractor distinctiveness. However, these studies have been limited to simple visual features (e.g., orientation, color), which leaves open the question of whether similar principles apply to complex stimuli, such as a face depicting an emotion, the perception of which is known to be shaped by conceptual knowledge. In three studies, we find confirmatory evidence for the hypothesis that attention modulates the representation of an emotional face to increase target-to-distractor distinctiveness. This occurs over-and-above strong pre-existing conceptual and perceptual biases in the representation of individual faces. The results are consistent with the view that visual search accuracy is determined by the representational distance between the target template in memory and distractor information in the environment, not the veridical target and distractor features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention: selective; Visual memory and face recognition; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31974937      PMCID: PMC8806142          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01965-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  30 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The role of relational information in contingent capture.

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Color in visual search.

Authors:  M D'Zmura
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Nicholas E DiQuattro; Jonathan Helm
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Correcting "confusability regions" in face morphs.

Authors:  Emma ZeeAbrahamsen; Jason Haberman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-08

7.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; E K Miller; J Duncan; R Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Modeling the influence of task on attention.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  1 in total

1.  Long-term memory interference is resolved via repulsion and precision along diagnostic memory dimensions.

Authors:  Maxwell L Drascher; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.