Literature DB >> 23565048

Searching Through the Hierarchy: How Level of Target Categorization Affects Visual Search.

Justin T Maxfield1, Gregory J Zelinsky.   

Abstract

Does the same basic-level advantage commonly observed in the categorization literature also hold for targets in a search task? We answered this question by first conducting a category verification task to define a set of categories showing a standard basic-level advantage, which we then used as stimuli in a search experiment. Participants were cued with a picture preview of the target or its category name at either superordinate, basic, or subordinate levels, then shown a target-present/absent search display. Although search guidance and target verification was best using pictorial cues, the effectiveness of the categorical cues depended on the hierarchical level. Search guidance was best for the specific subordinate level cues, while target verification showed a standard basic-level advantage. These findings demonstrate different hierarchical advantages for guidance and verification in categorical search. We interpret these results as evidence for a common target representation underlying categorical search guidance and verification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basic-level advantage; Categorical search; Category verification; Eye movements; Search guidance

Year:  2012        PMID: 23565048      PMCID: PMC3616399          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.735718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  13 in total

1.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Naomi Kenner; Megan Hyle; Nina Vasan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization.

Authors:  K E Johnson; C B Mervis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-09

6.  Category differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category advantage.

Authors:  G L Murphy; H H Brownell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Visual search guidance is best after a short delay.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual search and the collapse of categorization.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joshua S Redford; Lauren C Gent; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-11

10.  Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets.

Authors:  Hyejin Yang; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  21 in total

1.  Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Alexander C Berg; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Hossein Adeli; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Annmarie MacNamara; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Effects of target typicality on categorical search.

Authors:  Justin T Maxfield; Westri D Stalder; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Target specificity improves search, but how universal is the benefit?

Authors:  Ashley M Ercolino; Pooja Patel; Corey Bohil; Mark B Neider; Joseph Schmidt
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Eye can read your mind: decoding gaze fixations to reveal categorical search targets.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-04-01

Review 8.  Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Hayward J Godwin; Gemma Fitzsimmons; Arryn Robbins; Tamaryn Menneer; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A neural signature of rapid category-based target selection as a function of intra-item perceptual similarity, despite inter-item dissimilarity.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Zoe Pruitt; Megan Runkle; Gaia Scerif; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Yu; Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.