Literature DB >> 30743200

Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Joy J Geng1, Phillip Witkowski2.   

Abstract

All models of attention include the concept of an attentional template (or a target or search template). The template is conceptualized as target information held in memory that is used for prioritizing sensory processing and determining if an object matches the target. It is frequently assumed that the template contains a veridical copy of the target. However, we review recent evidence showing that the template encodes a version of the target that is adapted to the current context (e.g. distractors, task, etc.); information held within the template may include only a subset of target features, real world knowledge, pre-existing perceptual biases, or even be a distorted version of the veridical target. We argue that the template contents are customized in order to maximize the ability to prioritize information that distinguishes targets from distractors. We refer to this as template-to-distractor distinctiveness and hypothesize that it contributes to visual search efficiency by exaggerating target-to-distractor dissimilarity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30743200      PMCID: PMC6625942          DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol        ISSN: 2352-250X


  83 in total

1.  The What and Where of Visual Attention.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Marc Zirnsak
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception.

Authors:  J C Johnston; H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of search difficulty on the selection, maintenance, and learning of attentional templates.

Authors:  Eren Gunseli; Christian N L Olivers; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.

Authors:  H J Müller; D Heller; J Ziegler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

6.  Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Joseph Schmidt; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Search goal tunes visual features optimally.

Authors:  Vidhya Navalpakkam; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Searching for Category-Consistent Features: A Computational Approach to Understanding Visual Category Representation.

Authors:  Chen-Ping Yu; Justin T Maxfield; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-05-03

10.  Neural Determinants of Task Performance during Feature-Based Attention in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Mengyuan Gong; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-02-28
View more
  14 in total

1.  The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases.

Authors:  Mohsen Rafiei; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; David Whitney; Árni Kristjánsson; Andrey Chetverikov
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Viola S Störmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Tracking neural markers of template formation and implementation in attentional inhibition under different distractor consistency.

Authors:  Wen Wen 雯文; Zhibang Huang 邦黄志; Yin Hou 寅侯; Sheng Li 晟李
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Flexible target templates improve visual search accuracy for faces depicting emotion.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Jason Haberman; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Timothy D Hanks; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-12-08

Review 7.  Neural Coding of Cognitive Control: The Representational Similarity Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Michael C Freund; Joset A Etzel; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 24.482

Review 8.  The intersection between the oculomotor and hippocampal memory systems: empirical developments and clinical implications.

Authors:  Jennifer D Ryan; Kelly Shen; Zhong-Xu Liu
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 9.  Seeing Beyond Salience and Guidance: The Role of Bias and Decision in Visual Search.

Authors:  Alasdair D F Clarke; Anna Nowakowska; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 10.  Inhibition in selective attention.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.