Literature DB >> 26348995

Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.

Anita Nosratieh1, Andrew Hernandez, Sam Z Shen, Martin J Yaffe, J Anthony Seibert, John M Boone.   

Abstract

To develop tables of normalized glandular dose coefficients D(g)N for a range of anode-filter combinations and tube voltages used in contemporary breast imaging systems. Previously published mono-energetic D(g)N values were used with various spectra to mathematically compute D(g)N coefficients. The tungsten anode spectra from TASMICS were used; molybdenum and rhodium anode-spectra were generated using MCNPX Monte Carlo code. The spectra were filtered with various thicknesses of Al, Rh, Mo or Cu. An initial half value layer (HVL) calculation was made using the anode and filter material. A range of the HVL values was produced with the addition of small thicknesses of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as a surrogate for the breast compression paddle, to produce a range of HVL values at each tube voltage. Using a spectral weighting method, D(g)N coefficients for the generated spectra were calculated for breast glandular densities of 0%, 12.5%, 25%, 37.5%, 50% and 100% for a range of compressed breast thicknesses from 3 to 8 cm. Eleven tables of normalized glandular dose (D(g)N) coefficients were produced for the following anode/filter combinations: W + 50 μm Ag, W + 500 μm Al, W + 700 μm Al, W + 200 μm Cu, W + 300 μm Cu, W + 50 μm Rh, Mo + 400 μm Cu, Mo + 30 μm Mo, Mo + 25 μm Rh, Rh + 400 μm Cu and Rh + 25 μm Rh. Where possible, these results were compared to previously published D(g)N values and were found to be on average less than 2% different than previously reported values.Over 200 pages of D(g)N coefficients were computed for modeled x-ray system spectra that are used in a number of new breast imaging applications. The reported values were found to be in excellent agreement when compared to published values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26348995      PMCID: PMC4639529          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/18/7179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  19 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.

Authors:  John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.

Authors:  J M Boone; N Shah; T R Nelson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Frederic Noo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose.

Authors:  D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; John M Sabol; Johan Berglund; Wesley E Bolch; Libby Brateman; Emmanuel Christodoulou; Michael Flynn; William Geiser; Mitchell Goodsitt; A Kyle Jones; Joseph Y Lo; Andrew D A Maidment; Kazuyoshi Nishino; Anita Nosratieh; Baorui Ren; W Paul Segars; Miriam Von Tiedemann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Tungsten anode spectral model using interpolating cubic splines: unfiltered x-ray spectra from 20 kV to 640 kV.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.

Authors:  G R Hammerstein; D W Miller; D R White; M E Masterson; H Q Woodard; J S Laughlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols.

Authors:  D R Dance; K C Young; R E van Engen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.

Authors:  Antonio Sarno; David R Dance; Ruben E van Engen; Kenneth C Young; Paolo Russo; Francesca Di Lillo; Giovanni Mettivier; Kristina Bliznakova; Baowei Fei; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Objective assessment of task performance: a comparison of two FFDM detectors using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Andrey Makeev; Lynda C Ikejimba; Jesse Salad; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-17

3.  Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging.

Authors:  David R Dance; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development and preclinical evaluation of a patient-specific high energy x-ray phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Xizeng Wu; Laurie L Fajardo; Zhengxue Jing; Molly D Wong; Bin Zheng; Farid Omoumi; Yuhua Li; Aimin Yan; Peter Jenkins; Stephen L Hillis; Laura Linstroth; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Dose and spatial resolution analysis of grating-based phase-contrast mammography using an inverse Compton x-ray source.

Authors:  Lisa Heck; Elena Eggl; Susanne Grandl; Martin Dierolf; Christoph Jud; Benedikt Günther; Klaus Achterhold; Doris Mayr; Bernhard Gleich; Karin Hellerhoff; Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-22

6.  Dose-compatible grating-based phase-contrast mammography on mastectomy specimens using a compact synchrotron source.

Authors:  Elena Eggl; Susanne Grandl; Anikό Sztrόkay-Gaul; Martin Dierolf; Christoph Jud; Lisa Heck; Karin Burger; Benedikt Günther; Klaus Achterhold; Doris Mayr; Jan J Wilkens; Sigrid D Auweter; Bernhard Gleich; Karin Hellerhoff; Maximilian F Reiser; Franz Pfeiffer; Julia Herzen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.

Authors:  Tien-Yu Chang; Kuan-Jen Lai; Chun-Yuan Tu; Jay Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.