Literature DB >> 25186375

Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223.

Ioannis Sechopoulos1, John M Sabol2, Johan Berglund3, Wesley E Bolch4, Libby Brateman5, Emmanuel Christodoulou6, Michael Flynn7, William Geiser8, Mitchell Goodsitt6, A Kyle Jones9, Joseph Y Lo10, Andrew D A Maidment11, Kazuyoshi Nishino12, Anita Nosratieh13, Baorui Ren14, W Paul Segars10, Miriam Von Tiedemann15.   

Abstract

The radiation dose involved in any medical imaging modality that uses ionizing radiation needs to be well understood by the medical physics and clinical community. This is especially true of screening modalities. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has recently been introduced into the clinic and is being used for screening for breast cancer in the general population. Therefore, it is important that the medical physics community have the required information to be able to understand, estimate, and communicate the radiation dose levels involved in breast tomosynthesis imaging. For this purpose, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 223 on Dosimetry in Tomosynthesis Imaging has prepared this report that discusses dosimetry in breast imaging in general, and describes a methodology and provides the data necessary to estimate mean breast glandular dose from a tomosynthesis acquisition. In an effort to maximize familiarity with the procedures and data provided in this Report, the methodology to perform the dose estimation in DBT is based as much as possible on that used in mammography dose estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186375     DOI: 10.1118/1.4892600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.

Authors:  Suman Shrestha; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Implementation and CT sampling characterization of a third-generation SPECT-CT system for dedicated breast imaging.

Authors:  Jainil P Shah; Steve D Mann; Randolph L McKinley; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-31

4.  Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; D Bernardi; N Houssami
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  T M Svahn; N Houssami; I Sechopoulos; S Mattsson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 6.  Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data.

Authors:  John M Boone; Andrew M Hernandez; J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging.

Authors:  David R Dance; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems.

Authors:  Muhammad U Ghani; Molly D Wong; Farid H Omoumi; Bin Zheng; Laurie L Fajardo; Aimin Yan; Xizeng Wu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Mean glandular dose coefficients (D(g)N) for x-ray spectra used in contemporary breast imaging systems.

Authors:  Anita Nosratieh; Andrew Hernandez; Sam Z Shen; Martin J Yaffe; J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Conspicuity of suspicious breast lesions on contrast enhanced breast CT compared to digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography.

Authors:  Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri; Craig K Abbey; Javier E López; Andrew M Hernandez; Peymon Gazi; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.