Literature DB >> 27617767

Dosimetry in x-ray-based breast imaging.

David R Dance1, Ioannis Sechopoulos.   

Abstract

The estimation of the mean glandular dose to the breast (MGD) for x-ray based imaging modalities forms an essential part of quality control and is needed for risk estimation and for system design and optimisation. This review considers the development of methods for estimating the MGD for mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and dedicated breast CT (DBCT). Almost all of the methodology used employs Monte Carlo calculated conversion factors to relate the measurable quantity, generally the incident air kerma, to the MGD. After a review of the size and composition of the female breast, the various mathematical models used are discussed, with particular emphasis on models for mammography. These range from simple geometrical shapes, to the more recent complex models based on patient DBCT examinations. The possibility of patient-specific dose estimates is considered as well as special diagnostic views and the effect of breast implants. Calculations using the complex models show that the MGD for mammography is overestimated by about 30% when the simple models are used. The design and uses of breast-simulating test phantoms for measuring incident air kerma are outlined and comparisons made between patient and phantom-based dose estimates. The most widely used national and international dosimetry protocols for mammography are based on different simple geometrical models of the breast, and harmonisation of these protocols using more complex breast models is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27617767      PMCID: PMC5061150          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/R271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  71 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; J Anthony Seibert; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of the absorbed dose to the breast using radiochromic film in a dedicated CT mammotomography system employing a quasi-monochromatic x-ray beam.

Authors:  Dominic J Crotty; Samuel L Brady; D'Vone C Jackson; Greta I Toncheva; Colin E Anderson; Terry T Yoshizumi; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Aspects of forward scattering from the compression paddle in the dosimetry of mammography.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Niina Könönen; Marjut Timonen; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.

Authors:  B Liu; M Goodsitt; H P Chan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The Monte Carlo calculation of integral radiation dose in xeromammography.

Authors:  D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography.

Authors:  A Kelaranta; P Toroi; M Timonen; S Komssi; M Kortesniemi
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  Average glandular dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of phantom and patient data.

Authors:  R W Bouwman; R E van Engen; K C Young; G J den Heeten; M J M Broeders; S Schopphoven; C R L P N Jeukens; W J H Veldkamp; D R Dance
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  9 in total

1.  Dose and diagnostic performance comparison between phase-contrast mammography with synchrotron radiation and digital mammography: a clinical study report.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Luigi Rigon; Fulvia Arfelli; Diego Dreossi; Elisa Quai; Maura Tonutti; Giuliana Tromba; Maria Assunta Cova; Renata Longo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-01

2.  Monte Carlo study on optimal breast voxel resolution for dosimetry estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Carolina Rabin; Marco Caballo; Oliver Diaz; Eloy García; Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Gabriel A González-Sprinberg; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data.

Authors:  John M Boone; Andrew M Hernandez; J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Report on G4-Med, a Geant4 benchmarking system for medical physics applications developed by the Geant4 Medical Simulation Benchmarking Group.

Authors:  P Arce; D Bolst; M-C Bordage; J M C Brown; P Cirrone; M A Cortés-Giraldo; D Cutajar; G Cuttone; L Desorgher; P Dondero; A Dotti; B Faddegon; C Fedon; S Guatelli; S Incerti; V Ivanchenko; D Konstantinov; I Kyriakou; G Latyshev; A Le; C Mancini-Terracciano; M Maire; A Mantero; M Novak; C Omachi; L Pandola; A Perales; Y Perrot; G Petringa; J M Quesada; J Ramos-Méndez; F Romano; A B Rosenfeld; L G Sarmiento; D Sakata; T Sasaki; I Sechopoulos; E C Simpson; T Toshito; D H Wright
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Average absorbed breast dose in mammography: a new possible dose index matching the requirements of the European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM.

Authors:  Antonio C Traino; Chiara Sottocornola; Patrizio Barca; Carolina Marini; Giacomo Aringhieri; Davide Caramella; M Evelina Fantacci
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2017-12-28

6.  Internal breast dosimetry in mammography: Monte Carlo validation in homogeneous and anthropomorphic breast phantoms with a clinical mammography system.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Marco Caballo; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparison of a personalized breast dosimetry method with standard dosimetry protocols.

Authors:  Elisabeth Salomon; Peter Homolka; Friedrich Semturs; Michael Figl; Michael Gruber; Johann Hummel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Fibroglandular tissue distribution in the breast during mammography and tomosynthesis based on breast CT data: A patient-based characterization of the breast parenchyma.

Authors:  Christian Fedon; Marco Caballo; Eloy García; Oliver Diaz; John M Boone; David R Dance; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Patient-derived heterogeneous breast phantoms for advanced dosimetry in mammography and tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Marco Caballo; Carolina Rabin; Christian Fedon; Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Oliver Diaz; John M Boone; David R Dance; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.506

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.