| Literature DB >> 26287927 |
Meveshni Govender1, Randy C Bowen2, Massiell L German2, Grzegorz Bulaj3, Carol S Bruggers1,2,4,5.
Abstract
Pediatric oncology patients often experience fatigue and physical and mental deconditioning during and following chemotherapy treatments, contributing to diminished quality of life. Patient empowerment is a core principle of patient-centered care and reflects one's ability to positively affect his or her own health behavior and health status. Empowerment interventions may enhance patients' internal locus of control, resilience, coping skills, and self-management of symptoms related to disease and therapy. Clinical and technological advancements in therapeutic videogames and mobile medical applications (mobile health) can facilitate delivery of the empowerment interventions for medical purposes. This review summarizes clinical strategies for empowering pediatric cancer patients, as well as their relationship with developing a "fighting spirit" in physical and mental health. To better understand physiological aspects of empowerment and to elucidate videogame-based intervention strategies, brain neuronal circuits and neurotransmitters during stress, fear, and resilience are also discussed. Neuroimaging studies point to the role of the reward system pathways in resilience and empowerment in patients. Taken together, videogames and mobile health applications open translational research opportunities to develop and deliver empowerment interventions to pediatric cancer patients and also to those with other chronic diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26287927 PMCID: PMC4545566 DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Games Health J ISSN: 2161-783X

Empowerment accelerated improvements in physical and mental health of a patient, as shown by two possible recovery trajectories. Effectiveness of patient empowerment can be monitored by time dependence of health-related quality of life metric tools. (Color graphics available at www.liebertonline.com/g4h)
Studies Illustrating Benefits of Interventions Directed at Children and Adolescents with Cancer
| Oncology camps | Therapeutic or recreational programs designed for children with cancer alone or together with their parents and/or siblings, usually in an environment that is controlled, safe, and away from stressors of home/hospital. Attendees participate in activities with the goal of improving physical, psychological, or social functioning. | Diverse measures, detailed in respective references | Improved cancer knowledge through peer learning; increased feelings of autonomy and self-confidence; improved mood and quality of life; improved friendship skills and relationships with family members; improved coping and functioning at home | Bradlyn et al.,[ |
| Group interventions: Opkoers | Opkoers is a standardized group intervention deigned to empower children with diverse chronic illnesses, including cancer, using cognitive behavioral techniques. Children 8–18 years old attend six sessions in which techniques designed to improve the following areas are taught: information seeking and giving; positive thinking; and relaxation and social competence. | Opkoers Questionnaire for parent and child; Cognitive Control Strategies Scale to determine outcomes of intervention; Dutch Child Behavior Checklist; State Trait Inventory for Children; Self Perception Profile for Children and Adolescents; DUX25 assessment of social and emotional outcomes | Short- and medium-term improvements in information seeking, positive thinking, and social competencies; fewer reported behavioral and emotional problems by parents; improved quality of daily functioning | Last et al.,[ |
| Group intervention: Opkoers Onkolgie | The above-described Opkoers intervention was adapted to include cancer-specific elements aimed at pediatric cancer survivors. A pilot study ( | Opkoers Questionnaire for parent and child; Cognitive Control Strategy Scale to determine outcomes of intervention | Improvements in social competencies and positive thinking were seen, and the intervention was deemed appropriate for adolescent cancer survivors. A cancer-specific module has been successfully implemented, with an adapted computer-accessible version created. | Maurice-Stam et al.[ |
| “I'm Cured…Now What? A Conference for Teen and Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer” (annual conferences 2006–2012) | Multidisciplinary day-long conference for childhood cancer survivors >17 years of age, including lectures on diverse topics such as survivorship, introduction to new therapies, small group sessions, and networking opportunities, as well as an incentive to improve conference attendance | Retrospective survey of survivor attendees of four different programs ( | Increased knowledge regarding late effects of therapy and the need for healthy diet, physical exercise, and stress reduction | Sadak et al.[ |
| Exercise intervention | Structured exercise programs given at home, sporting centers, or in hospital setting that included endurance, strength, aerobic, and/or coordination exercises | Measurements of feasibility, adverse effects, quality of life, and fatigue were used. | Majority of interventions were feasible. Improved quality of life and decreased cancer-related fatigue were shown. No adverse effects were reported. | Baumann et al.,[ |
Metric Tools Designed to Assess Empowerment
| General purpose, condition-specific tool designed to measure locus of control | 588 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain, diabetes, or cancer | 18-item general purpose, condition-specific locus of control scale adaptable for diverse medical or health-related conditions | Reliability and validity of the four Form C subscales—Internality, Chance, Doctors, and Other (powerful) People—were demonstrated. | Wallston et al.[ |
| To define a scale to measure the personal construct of empowerment | 271 members of six self-help programs in several states | Consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among mental healthcare users | Identified five factors: self-esteem; power–powerlessness; community activism; righteous anger; optimism—control over the future | Rogers et al.[ |
| To validate a specific tool in adult outpatient mental health population | Participants in a state outpatient mental healthcare system | Empowerment Scale | Confirmation of five subscales of empowerment: esteem; power; activism; anger; and control | Wowra and McCarter[ |
| To determine construct validity of empowerment among consumers of mental healthcare services | Users of mental health care services | Empowerment Scale | Self-empowerment as associated with quality of life, social support, self-esteem, and psychiatric symptoms. Community empowerment was correlated with self-esteem, resources, verbal intelligence, and ethnicity. | Corrigan et al.[ |
| To develop and validate a questionnaire measuring empowerment in personal health care and services | 873 participants in program of Research to Integrate Services for Maintenance of Autonomy | HCEQ | Confirmation of multidimensional concept of empowerment | Gagnon et al.[ |
| To measure one's confidence in ability to carry out specific goal-directed behavior | Participants in a videogame designed to improve behavioral outcomes in young cancer patients | Cancer-specific Self-efficacy Scale developed for this study | Using this tool, significantly improved self-efficacy was demonstrated in the intervention group over time compared with baseline. | Kato et al.[ |
| To measure cancer knowledge as result of specific intervention | Participants in a videogame designed to improve behavioral outcomes in young cancer patients | 18-item multiple choice questionnaire specifically designed for this study to measure patients' cancer knowledge delivered in a videogame | Using this tool, significantly improved cancer-related knowledge was demonstrated in the intervention group over time compared with baseline. | Kato et al.[ |
| To describe and assess available tools measuring disability that could be used in developing countries | Systematic comprehensive literature review | 17 different empowerment metric tools identified | Empowerment Scale is the most widely used in developing countries but further validation indicated | Bakker et al.[ |
| To systematically review literature regarding interactive Web-based empowerment interventions in cancer and chronic disease | PubMed, Embase, and Scopus database searches | Diabetes Empowerment Scale; Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale; Likert scale; Patient Activation Measure Self report; single question on a 1–10 scale; Cancer Behavior Inventory; Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; Perceived Competence Scales | Seven common elements applicable to electronic health to improve cancer survivors' empowerment: education; self-monitoring; tailored feedback; self-management symptom management training; personalized exercise program; communication with healthcare providers; and communication with fellow patients | Kuijpers et al.[ |
| To operationalize cancer empowerment as an outcome measure by describing psychometric properties of an empowerment questionnaire in breast cancer survivors | 140 breast cancer survivors | 40-item CEQ | CEQ can measure individual patient cancer empowerment by encompassing interpersonal and intrapersonal aspects. | van den Berg et al.[ |
| To investigate reliability and validity of a questionnaire designed to measure empowerment | 388 male and female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus | Self-completed, concise empowerment questionnaire | Questionnaire showed internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, factorial construct validity, and concurrent validity in the targeted patient population. | Hara et al.[ |
| To validate scales from the heiQ | Questionnaire completed by 731 adults treated for recent cancer. Validity and reliability were then assessed. | heiQ | Validity of heiQ scales as generic measures of cancer health-related empowerment was supported. | Maunsell et al.[ |
| To determine if SCM improved emotional well-being, empowerment, and symptom prevalence during chemotherapy | 97 adult participants with diverse cancers were randomized to SCM or standard of care. Assessment was done before, during, and after chemotherapy. | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Mimi-Mental Adjustment to Cancer, and Patient Empowerment Scale | Significant decrease in clinical anxiety in treatment group. No significant change in empowerment, symptom prevalence, or Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer and unchanged depression over time in the control group | Johnson et al.[ |
CEQ, Cancer Empowerment Questionnaire; HCEQ, Health Care Empowerment Questionnaire; heiQ, Health Education Impact Questionnaire' SCM, Shared Care Model.
Studies Illustrating Benefits of Computer-Based Interventions in Disease Management
| Evaluation of an interactive CD-ROM versus a book about leukemia in children with leukemia | Compared with the book, (1) children using the CD-ROM showed and increased feeling of control over their health, and (2) children and parents were more satisfied using the CD-ROM and used it more frequently and for longer time periods. | Dragone et al.[ |
| Evaluation of an interactive CD-ROM designed for adolescents with cancer versus a handbook | Compared with the handbook, there were greater acceptability of the CD-ROM and increased internal locus of control in teens. | Jones et al.[ |
| To determine whether participation in online support groups has an effect on patient empowerment in adults with chronic diseases | Patients reported improvements in knowledge, social contact, and feelings of confidence, optimism, and control and felt more prepared to interact with healthcare professionals. | van Uden-Kraan et al.[ |
| To determine the effect of an online cognitive behavioral program (MoodGYM) designed to decrease and prevent symptoms of depression and anxiety in adolescents | Decreased anxiety symptoms in both males and females and decreased depression symptoms in males were found. | Calear et al.[ |
| To determine effect of playing a virtual reality game on procedural pain in children with acute burn injuries | Virtual reality coupled with analgesics was significantly more efficacious in pain reduction than analgesics alone. | Das et al.[ |
| To examine feasibility and safety of establishing a virtual community in children undergoing chronic hemodialysis in a hospital setting | “Zora” was enjoyable and safe and provided pediatric renal patients with a means of coping with chronic physical illness. | Bers et al.[ |
| To examine feasibility and safety of using a Web-based virtual community for psychosocial support in adolescents in the home setting following solid organ transplantation | “Zora” was safe and effective as a potential psychosocial intervention for adolescents at home following solid organ transplantation. | Bers et al.[ |

Overview of relationships among brain structures, hormone feedback systems, and psychosocial conditions following stress exposure. (A) A healthy response following stress results in a favorable dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA):cortisol ratio of greater than 1, as a result of negative feedback inhibition of cortisol on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. Such a condition is neuroprotective and may promote resilience. ACTH, adrenocorticoptropic hormone; CRH, corticotrophin-releasing hormone. (B) Following excessive stress, failure of this negative feedback can result in continued cortisol production and hence an unfavorable DHEA:cortisol ratio of less than 1. This may result in impaired neurogenesis and decreased resilience. (C) Physical exercise and stress-coping strategies can decrease stress and thus promote neurogenesis, learning, and improved memory. (D) Stimulation of the nucleus accumbens by positive rewards enhances patient empowerment and promotes optimism and hope. In contrast, absence of an expected reward results in no stimulation of the nucleus accumbens and can increase depression and/or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).