Cati G Brown-Johnson1, Beth Berrean2, Janine K Cataldo3. 1. Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA. 2. S/M Operating Units, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. 3. Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. Electronic address: janine.cataldo@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility and usability of mHealth TLC, an interactive, immersive 3-dimensional iPad health game that coaches lung cancer patients toward assertive communication strategies during first-person virtual clinics visits. METHOD: We observed players and conducted semi-structured interviews. Research questions focused on scenario believability, the impact of technical issues, transparency of game goals, and potential of mHealth TLC to decrease lung cancer stigma (LCS) and improve patient-clinician communication. RESULTS: Eight users confirmed mHealth TLC to be: (1) believable, (2) clinic-appropriate, and (3) helpful in support of informed healthcare consumers. Concerns were expressed about emotionally charged content and plans to use mHealth TLC in clinic settings as opposed to at home. CONCLUSIONS: Although the dialog and interactions addressed emotionally charged issues, players were able to engage, learn, and benefit from role-play in a virtual world. Health games have the potential to improve patient-clinician communication, and mHealth TLC specifically may decrease LCS, and promote optimal self-management. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Process reflection revealed the need for health games to be created by experienced game developers in collaboration with health care experts. To prepare for this best practice, research institutions and game developers interested in health games should proactively seek out networking and collaboration opportunities.
OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility and usability of mHealth TLC, an interactive, immersive 3-dimensional iPad health game that coaches lung cancerpatients toward assertive communication strategies during first-person virtual clinics visits. METHOD: We observed players and conducted semi-structured interviews. Research questions focused on scenario believability, the impact of technical issues, transparency of game goals, and potential of mHealth TLC to decrease lung cancer stigma (LCS) and improve patient-clinician communication. RESULTS: Eight users confirmed mHealth TLC to be: (1) believable, (2) clinic-appropriate, and (3) helpful in support of informed healthcare consumers. Concerns were expressed about emotionally charged content and plans to use mHealth TLC in clinic settings as opposed to at home. CONCLUSIONS: Although the dialog and interactions addressed emotionally charged issues, players were able to engage, learn, and benefit from role-play in a virtual world. Health games have the potential to improve patient-clinician communication, and mHealth TLC specifically may decrease LCS, and promote optimal self-management. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Process reflection revealed the need for health games to be created by experienced game developers in collaboration with health care experts. To prepare for this best practice, research institutions and game developers interested in health games should proactively seek out networking and collaboration opportunities.
Authors: Soledad Ballesteros; Antonio Prieto; Julia Mayas; Pilar Toril; Carmen Pita; Laura Ponce de León; José M Reales; John Waterworth Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Heidi A Hamann; Elizabeth S Ver Hoeve; Lisa Carter-Harris; Jamie L Studts; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Rebecca L Watkins; Felicia A Browne; Paul N Kizakevich; Brittni N Howard; Leslie B Turner; Randall Eckhoff; Wendee M Wechsberg Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-05-09
Authors: Denalee M O'Malley; Stacy N Davis; Katie A Devine; Brittany Sullivan; Alicja Bator; Lynn Clemow; Jeanne M Ferrante; Patricia A Findley; Suzanne M Miller; Shawna V Hudson Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Elise Martin; Antonio Di Meglio; Cecile Charles; Arlindo Ferreira; Arnauld Gbenou; Marine Blond; Benoit Fagnou; Johanna Arvis; Barbara Pistilli; Mahasti Saghatchian; Ines Vaz Luis Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2021-03-22