Literature DB >> 26220127

[Physical interactions in MRI: Some rules of thumb for their reduction].

M Mühlenweg1, G Schaefers, S Trattnig.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most powerful and at the same time gentlest clinical imaging techniques at the present time; however, the enormous physical complexity as well as simple inattentiveness (projectile effect) implicate a significant risk potential and place high demands on the MR operator to ensure a safe workflow. A sound knowledge of the potential MR interactions is the foundation for a safe and profitable operation for all parties.The first part of this article deals with the three most important sources of physical interaction, i.e. static magnetic field, gradient and high-frequency (HF) fields. The paper discusses the differences between each type of field with respect to the impact on human beings, the interactions with magnetic and electrically conducting objects/implants and the relevant safety standards. Each section is followed by simple rules of thumb to minimize potentially unwanted physical MRI interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26220127     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-015-2812-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  28 in total

Review 1.  Safety of strong, static magnetic fields.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Occupational exposure in MRI.

Authors:  D W McRobbie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Specific absorption rate as a poor indicator of magnetic resonance-related implant heating.

Authors:  Wolfgang R Nitz; Gerd Brinker; Dirk Diehl; Georg Frese
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Cellular disorders induced by high magnetic fields.

Authors:  Odile Valiron; Leticia Peris; Geert Rikken; Annie Schweitzer; Yasmina Saoudi; Chantal Remy; Didier Job
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-induced deep second-degree burns of lower extremities by conducting loop.

Authors:  Y Ito; Y Omoto; K Habe; K-I Yamanaka; A Hakamada; K-I Isoda; I Kurokawa; H Mizutani
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 Tesla MRI.

Authors:  Deborah A Langman; Ira B Goldberg; J Paul Finn; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013.

Authors:  Emanuel Kanal; A James Barkovich; Charlotte Bell; James P Borgstede; William G Bradley; Jerry W Froelich; J Rod Gimbel; John W Gosbee; Ellisa Kuhni-Kaminski; Paul A Larson; James W Lester; John Nyenhuis; Daniel Joe Schaefer; Elizabeth A Sebek; Jeffrey Weinreb; Bruce L Wilkoff; Terry O Woods; Leonard Lucey; Dina Hernandez
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Recent advances in MRI technology: Implications for image quality and patient safety.

Authors:  Wlad T Sobol
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10

Review 9.  [Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF)--implications for radiology].

Authors:  H J Michaely; H S Thomsen; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5-7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms.

Authors:  Kristel Schaap; Yvette Christopher-de Vries; Catherine K Mason; Frank de Vocht; Lützen Portengen; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  2 in total

1.  A sum-modified-Laplacian and sparse representation based multimodal medical image fusion in Laplacian pyramid domain.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Li; Xuming Zhang; Mingyue Ding
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  [MRI-Interactions with magnetically active and electrically conductive material].

Authors:  F Schick
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.