Literature DB >> 31410692

A sum-modified-Laplacian and sparse representation based multimodal medical image fusion in Laplacian pyramid domain.

Xiaoqing Li1, Xuming Zhang1, Mingyue Ding2.   

Abstract

Fusion of multimodal medical images provides complementary information for diagnosis, surgical planning, and clinical outcome evaluation. Although the multiscale decomposition-based fusion methods have attracted much attention among researchers, the challenges of determining the decomposition levels and the loss of contrast hindered their applications. Here, we present a multimodal medical images fusion method combining the sum-modified-Laplacian (SML) with sparse representation (SR) in the Laplacian pyramid domain. In this method, we first transformed the original images into the high-pass and low-pass bands by the Laplacian pyramid (LP). Then, we use SML and SR to fuse the high- and low-pass bands, respectively. The proposed method has been compared with different methods including NSST_VGG_MAX, DWT_ARV_BURTS, CVT_MAX_LIS, and NSCT_SR_MAX. We also conducted multiple experiments on four groups of medical images, including CT and MR, T1-weighted MR and T2-weighted MR, PET and MR, as well as SPECT and MR, to demonstrate the advantages of our method. Visual and quantitative results illustrate that our method can produce the fused images with better brightness contrast and retain more image details than other evaluated methods on the basis of MI, LAB/F, QAB/F, and Qw. Furthermore, our method could preserve more fine and useful functional information with better image contrast, which is highly relevant in the assessment of lesion shapes and positions. Graphical abstract The basic framework of the proposed fusion method based on sum-modified-Laplacian and sparse representation based in Laplacian pyramid domain using CT and MR images. In the proposed method, the source images are transformed into the low-pass bands and the high-pass bands using the Laplacian pyramid (LP). The low-pass bands are fused by SR, while SML is used to fuse the high-pass bands. Visual and quantitative results show that the proposed method can produce fused images with better brightness contrast and retain more image details than the other compared methods.

Keywords:  Laplacian pyramid; Medical image fusion; Sparse representation; Sum-modified-Laplacian

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31410692     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02023-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  25 in total

1.  Joint Sparse Representation and Robust Feature-Level Fusion for Multi-Cue Visual Tracking.

Authors:  Xiangyuan Lan; Andy J Ma; Pong C Yuen; Rama Chellappa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 2.  Ultrasound imaging in research and clinical medicine.

Authors:  Michael A Schellpfeffer
Journal:  Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today       Date:  2013-06

3.  Multi dose computed tomography image fusion based on hybrid sparse methodology.

Authors:  Anuyogam Venkataraman; Javad Alirezaie; Paul Babyn; Alireza Ahmadian
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

4.  Group-based sparse representation for image restoration.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Debin Zhao; Wen Gao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  LGE-KSVD: robust sparse representation classification.

Authors:  Raymond Ptucha; Andreas E Savakis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Correlative Microscopy Combining Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry and Electron Microscopy: Comparison of Intensity-Hue-Saturation and Laplacian Pyramid Methods for Image Fusion.

Authors:  Florian Vollnhals; Jean-Nicolas Audinot; Tom Wirtz; Muriel Mercier-Bonin; Isabelle Fourquaux; Birgit Schroeppel; Udo Kraushaar; Varda Lev-Ram; Mark H Ellisman; Santhana Eswara
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  PET imaging in neurology: Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.

Authors:  Ismet Sarikaya
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 8.  CT in head trauma: a review.

Authors:  J N Diaconis; K C Rao
Journal:  J Comput Tomogr       Date:  1980-12

Review 9.  Present and future of fMRI in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.618

10.  Dual-tree complex wavelet transform and image block residual-based multi-focus image fusion in visual sensor networks.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Song Tong; Shuying Huang; Pan Lin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.