Literature DB >> 22457400

Occupational exposure in MRI.

D W McRobbie1.   

Abstract

This article reviews occupational exposure in clinical MRI; it specifically considers units of exposure, basic physical interactions, health effects, guideline limits, dosimetry, results of exposure surveys, calculation of induced fields and the status of the European Physical Agents Directive. Electromagnetic field exposure in MRI from the static field B(0), imaging gradients and radiofrequency transmission fields induces electric fields and currents in tissue, which are responsible for various acute sensory effects. The underlying theory and its application to the formulation of incident and induced field limits are presented. The recent International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers limits for incident field exposure are interpreted in a manner applicable to MRI. Field measurements show that exposure from movement within the B(0) fringe field can exceed ICNIRP reference levels within 0.5 m of the bore entrance. Rate of change of field dB/dt from the imaging gradients is unlikely to exceed the new limits, although incident field limits can be exceeded for radiofrequency (RF) exposure within 0.2-0.5 m of the bore entrance. Dosimetric surveys of routine clinical practice show that staff are exposed to peak values of 42 ± 24% of B(0), with time-averaged exposures of 5.2 ± 2.8 mT for magnets in the range 0.6-4 T. Exposure to time-varying fields arising from movement within the B(0) fringe resulted in peak dB/dt of approximately 2 T s(-1). Modelling of induced electric fields from the imaging gradients shows that ICNIRP-induced field limits are unlikely to be exceeded in most situations; however, movement through the static field may still present a problem. The likely application of the limits is discussed with respect to the reformulation of the European Union (EU) directive and its possible implications for MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22457400      PMCID: PMC3486652          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/30146162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  67 in total

1.  Physiologic effects of intense MR imaging gradient fields.

Authors:  J D Bourland; J A Nyenhuis; D J Schaefer
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 2.  Electromagnetic field exposure limitation and the future of MRI.

Authors:  S F Keevil; W Gedroyc; P Gowland; D L G Hill; M O Leach; C N Ludman; K McLeish; D W McRobbie; R S Razavi; I R Young
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience.

Authors:  Thomas Schulz; Silvia Puccini; Jens-Peter Schneider; Thomas Kahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Hinkelien van Drooge; Hans Engels; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?

Authors:  Derek L G Hill; Kate McLeish; Stephen F Keevil
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.

Authors:  Colin R Roy; Lindsay J Martin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 7.  Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.

Authors:  Kari Jokela
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.316

8.  Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRI: effects of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates.

Authors:  C L Ham; J M Engels; G T van de Wiel; A Machielsen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) Technical Information Statement "exposure of medical personnel to electromagnetic fields from open magnetic resonance imaging systems".

Authors:  H Bassen; D J Schaefer; L Zaremba; J Bushberg; M Ziskin; K R Foster
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Cognitive effects of head-movements in stray fields generated by a 7 Tesla whole-body MRI magnet.

Authors:  F de Vocht; T Stevens; P Glover; A Sunderland; P Gowland; H Kromhout
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.010

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  [Physical interactions in MRI: Some rules of thumb for their reduction].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Evaluation of exposure to (ultra) high static magnetic fields during activities around human MRI scanners.

Authors:  Mahsa Fatahi; Jolanta Karpowicz; Krzysztof Gryz; Amirmohammad Fattahi; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Cytotoxic effects of moderate static magnetic field exposure on human periphery blood mononuclear cells are influenced by Val16Ala-MnSOD gene polymorphism.

Authors:  Eduardo B Dornelles; Bayard D Goncalves; Karen Lilian Schott; Fernanda Barbisan; Tais C Unfer; Werner G Glanzner; Alencar K Machado; Francine C Cadona; Veronica Farina Azzolin; Marco Aurélio Echart Montano; John Griner; Ivana B M da Cruz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Subacute static magnetic field exposure in rat induces a pseudoanemia status with increase in MCT4 and Glut4 proteins in glycolytic muscle.

Authors:  Miryam Elferchichi; Jacques Mercier; Mohamed Ammari; Hatem Belguith; Hafedh Abdelmelek; Mohsen Sakly; Karen Lambert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Subjective perception of safety in healthy individuals working with 7 T MRI scanners: a retrospective multicenter survey.

Authors:  Mahsa Fatahi; Liliana Ramona Demenescu; Oliver Speck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Occupational Exposure Assessment of the Static Magnetic Field Generated by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Case Study.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Carlo Sansotta; Maria Sole Morelli; Barbara Testagrossa; Giuseppe Acri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  [New aspects from legislation, guidelines and safety standards for MRI].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

10.  Chronic Exposure to Static Magnetic Fields from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Devices Deserves Screening for Osteoporosis and Vitamin D Levels: A Rat Model.

Authors:  Harun R Gungor; Semih Akkaya; Nusret Ok; Aygun Yorukoglu; Cagdas Yorukoglu; Esat Kiter; Emin O Oguz; Nazan Keskin; Gulcin A Mete
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.