Literature DB >> 21274985

Pacemaker lead tip heating in abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads at 1.5 Tesla MRI.

Deborah A Langman1, Ira B Goldberg, J Paul Finn, Daniel B Ennis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of RF-induced heating in pacemaker-attached and abandoned leads using in vitro temperature measurements at 1.5 Tesla as a function of lead length.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five custom lead lengths, 20-60 cm, were exposed to a uniform magnitude and phase radiofrequency electric field to examine the effect of lead length on pacemaker lead tip heating for pacemaker-attached and abandoned pacemaker leads.
RESULTS: Abandoned and pacemaker-attached leads show resonant heating behavior and maximum heating occurs at different lead lengths due to the differences in termination conditions. For clinical lead lengths (40-60 cm) abandoned leads exhibited greater lead tip heating compared with pacemaker-attached leads.
CONCLUSION: Current recommendations for MRI pacemaker safety should highlight the possible increased risk for patients with abandoned leads as compared to pacemaker-attached leads.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21274985     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  41 in total

1.  [Magnetic resonance imaging and implantable cardiac devices. Current status and future perspectives of MR-compatible systems].

Authors:  M Dorenkamp; M Roser; B Hamm; W Haverkamp
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 2.  [Physical interactions in MRI: Some rules of thumb for their reduction].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  It's the little things: On the complexity of planar electrode heating in MRI.

Authors:  Johannes B Erhardt; Thomas Lottner; Jessica Martinez; Ali C Özen; Martin Schuettler; Thomas Stieglitz; Daniel B Ennis; Michael Bock
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a single-center prospective study.

Authors:  Mrinal Yadava; Matthew Nugent; Angela Krebsbach; Jessica Minnier; Peter Jessel; Charles A Henrikson
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 5.  Safety of implanted cardiac devices in an MRI environment.

Authors:  Esra Gucuk Ipek; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  A Review of Numerical Simulation and Analytical Modeling for Medical Devices Safety in MRI.

Authors:  J Kabil; L Belguerras; S Trattnig; C Pasquier; J Felblinger; A Missoffe
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

7.  A numerical investigation on the effect of RF coil feed variability on global and local electromagnetic field exposure in human body models at 64 MHz.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Tom Lloyd; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  John V Higgins; Robert E Watson; Allan S Jaffe; Connie Dalzell; Nancy Acker; Joel P Felmlee; Samuel J Asirvatham; Yong-Mei Cha; Paul A Friedman; Suraj Kapa
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  [MR implant labelling and its use in clinical MRI practice].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  [Pacemaker and MRI in clinical practice].

Authors:  A Fendt; M Strauß; K Kouraki; R Zahn; T Kleemann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.