PURPOSE: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures is inevitably increasing. Sufficient stabilisation and proper screw placement next to large-volume implants remains difficult. Modern locking plates allow polyaxial, thus bicortical, screw placement around a prosthetic stem. This study analysed the biomechanical properties of different screw configurations in a locking plate construct of a periprosthetic femoral fracture model. METHODS: A total of 20 Sawbones were used to stabilise a Vancouver-B1 femoral fracture with a locking plate using either four monocortical screws or three bicortical screws for proximal fixation. These were loaded with an increasing axial compression until failure. RESULTS: Bicortical screw purchase was significantly superior to monocortical regarding load to failure (1,510 N ± 284 N versus 2,350 N ± 212 N, p < 0.001) and maximal number of cycles (6803 ± 760 versus 4041 ± 923, p < 0.001). However, the mode of failure in the bicortical group was a severe comminuted fracture pattern as opposed to the monocortical group in which a pull-out of the screws without further damage to the bone was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bicortical screw placement enhances the primary stability in treating periprosthetic femoral fractures. Notably, the mode of failure may limit the salvage options in case of revision surgery.
PURPOSE: The incidence of periprosthetic fractures is inevitably increasing. Sufficient stabilisation and proper screw placement next to large-volume implants remains difficult. Modern locking plates allow polyaxial, thus bicortical, screw placement around a prosthetic stem. This study analysed the biomechanical properties of different screw configurations in a locking plate construct of a periprosthetic femoral fracture model. METHODS: A total of 20 Sawbones were used to stabilise a Vancouver-B1 femoral fracture with a locking plate using either four monocortical screws or three bicortical screws for proximal fixation. These were loaded with an increasing axial compression until failure. RESULTS: Bicortical screw purchase was significantly superior to monocortical regarding load to failure (1,510 N ± 284 N versus 2,350 N ± 212 N, p < 0.001) and maximal number of cycles (6803 ± 760 versus 4041 ± 923, p < 0.001). However, the mode of failure in the bicortical group was a severe comminuted fracture pattern as opposed to the monocortical group in which a pull-out of the screws without further damage to the bone was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Bicortical screw placement enhances the primary stability in treating periprosthetic femoral fractures. Notably, the mode of failure may limit the salvage options in case of revision surgery.
Authors: Martin F Hoffmann; Travis A Burgers; James J Mason; Bart O Williams; Debra L Sietsema; Clifford B Jones Journal: Injury Date: 2014-03-11 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: Todd L Bredbenner; Scott A Snyder; Farzad R Mazloomi; Toan Le; Roger G Wilber Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Harry A Demos; Marcus S Briones; Peter H White; Kathleen A Hogan; William R Barfield Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2011-10-19 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Mark Lenz; Stephan Marcel Perren; Robert Geoff Richards; Thomas Mückley; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Boyko Gueorguiev; Markus Windolf Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Dirk Wähnert; Marcus Müller; Hendrik Tiedemann; Sven Märdian; Michael J Raschke; Clemens Kösters Journal: J Orthop Translat Date: 2020-02-08 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Daniel Rau; Gabriele Rußow; Mark Heyland; Dag Wulsten; Clemens Kösters; Werner Schmölz; Sven Märdian Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Clemens Kösters; Daniel den Toom; Sven Märdian; Steffen Roßlenbroich; Sebastian Metzlaff; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Jens Everding Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 4.241