Khang H Dang1, Connor A Armstrong1, Ravi A Karia1, Boris A Zelle2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, MC-7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, MC-7774, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. zelle@uthscsa.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Given the recent controversy in the literature and the alarming reports of early mechanical failure associated with the use of the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate in acute distal femur fractures, the goal of our study was to examine the outcomes and mechanical failure rates of this implant in a larger patient population. METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who underwent plate fixation of their acute distal femoral fracture using the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate were included in this retrospective study. The study data was collected through a retrospective chart review and review of the existing radiographic studies. Primary outcome measure was mechanical hardware failure while secondary outcome measures included nonunion, malunion, and medical and surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (77 fractures) were included in this study. The fractures were classified according to the OTA/AO classification as 33-A2 (n = 6), 33-A3 (n = 19), 33-C1 (n = 5), 33-C2 (n = 25), and 33-C3 (n = 22). Thirty-two out of 77 fractures presented as open fractures (41.6%). A mechanical failure was observed in 7 patients (9.1%). Twenty additional patients needed a re-operation of the surgical site including two nonunion repairs, one malunion repair, 15 staged treatments of traumatic segmental bone defects, and two soft tissue debridements. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate is a safe and effective implant with a relatively low mechanical failure rate.
PURPOSE: Given the recent controversy in the literature and the alarming reports of early mechanical failure associated with the use of the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate in acute distal femur fractures, the goal of our study was to examine the outcomes and mechanical failure rates of this implant in a larger patient population. METHODS:Patients 18 years of age and older who underwent plate fixation of their acute distal femoral fracture using the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate were included in this retrospective study. The study data was collected through a retrospective chart review and review of the existing radiographic studies. Primary outcome measure was mechanical hardware failure while secondary outcome measures included nonunion, malunion, and medical and surgical complications. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients (77 fractures) were included in this study. The fractures were classified according to the OTA/AO classification as 33-A2 (n = 6), 33-A3 (n = 19), 33-C1 (n = 5), 33-C2 (n = 25), and 33-C3 (n = 22). Thirty-two out of 77 fractures presented as open fractures (41.6%). A mechanical failure was observed in 7 patients (9.1%). Twenty additional patients needed a re-operation of the surgical site including two nonunion repairs, one malunion repair, 15 staged treatments of traumatic segmental bone defects, and two soft tissue debridements. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate is a safe and effective implant with a relatively low mechanical failure rate.
Authors: Christopher E Henderson; Trevor J Lujan; Lori L Kuhl; Michael Bottlang; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; John L Marsh Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-03-22 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Jason C Tank; Prism S Schneider; Elizabeth Davis; Matthew Galpin; Mark L Prasarn; Andrew M Choo; John W Munz; Timothy S Achor; James F Kellam; Joshua L Gary Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Çağrı Özcan; Sami Sökücü; Kubilay Beng; Engin Çetinkaya; Bilal Demir; Yavuz Selim Kabukçuoğlu Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.075