Literature DB >> 20888674

Periprosthetic fracture fixation of the femur following total hip arthroplasty: a review of biomechanical testing.

Mehran Moazen1, Alison C Jones, Zhongmin Jin, Ruth K Wilcox, Eleftherios Tsiridis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: periprosthetic femoral fracture can occur following total hip arthroplasty. Fixation of these fractures are challenging due to the combination of fractured bone with an existing prosthesis. There are several clinical studies reporting the failure of fixation methods used for these fractures, highlighting the importance of further biomechanical studies in this area.
METHODS: the current literature on biomechanical models of periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation is reviewed. The methodologies involved in the experimental and computational studies of this fixation are described and compared.
FINDINGS: areas which require further investigation are highlighted and the potential use of finite element analysis as a computational tool to test the current fixation methods is addressed.
INTERPRETATION: biomechanical models have huge potential to assess the effectiveness of different fixation methods. Experimental in vitro models have been used to mimic periprosthetic femoral fracture fixation however, the numbers of measurements that are possible in these studies are relatively limited due to the cost and data acquisition constraints. Computer modelling and in particular finite element analysis is a complimentary method that could be used to examine existing protocols for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture and, potentially, find optimum fixation methods for specific fracture types. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20888674     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  11 in total

1.  Treatment of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Carl Haasper; Mohammad Ali Enayatollahi; Thorsten Gehrke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

4.  Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Authors:  Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Cyrus T Caroom; Hwabok Wee; Darin Jurgensmeier; Shane D Rothermel; Michelle A Bramer; John Spence Reid
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Cement-in-cement versus uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  John W Kennedy; Alex Hrycaiczuk; Nigel Y B Ng; Owen Sheerins; Sanjeev R Patil; Bryn G Jones; Andrew Stark; R M Dominic Meek
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 7.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

8.  The impact of stem fixation method on Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management.

Authors:  Katherine Wang; Eustathios Kenanidis; Zakareya Gamie; Khurram Suleman; Mark Miodownik; Mahsa Avadi; David Horne; Jonathan Thompson; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Mehran Moazen
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-01-06

9.  A New System for Periprosthetic Fracture Stabilization-A Biomechanical Comparison.

Authors:  Daniel Rau; Gabriele Rußow; Mark Heyland; Dag Wulsten; Clemens Kösters; Werner Schmölz; Sven Märdian
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Biomechanics of Osteoporotic Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Marianne Hollensteiner; Sabrina Sandriesser; Emily Bliven; Christian von Rüden; Peter Augat
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.