Literature DB >> 8641069

Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures.

R K Beals1, S S Tower.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of 93 periprosthetic fractures and 102 periprosthetic fracture treatments showed that the type of prosthesis (cemented, ingrowth, Austin-Moore) and the presence of preexisting stress risers play a role in determining where the fractures occur. The site of fracture and the prefracture interface influence treatment of periprosthetic fractures. This study suggests that fractures associated with a loose interface, cemented or cementless, are best treated by removal of the prosthesis, reduction of the fracture, and insertion of a long stemmed prosthesis with additional fixation as needed. Treatment of a periprosthetic fracture associated with a stable prosthesis depends on the site of fracture. Fractures proximal to the tip of a fixed prosthesis usually can be treated nonoperatively or with limited internal fixation. Fractures at the tip of the prosthesis may be managed by revision or internal fixation, and fractures below the prosthesis can be managed operatively or nonoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8641069     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199606000-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  72 in total

1.  Polyaxial Locked Implants in the Treatment of Type Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur: Retrospective Clinical Examination in 58 Cases with Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jan Meiners; Maximilian Faschingbauer; Christine Voigt; Christian Jürgens; Arndt P Schulz
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  [Shaft lengthening in hip replacement: experimental studies on bending stiffness].

Authors:  K Burkhart; D Mehler; J Degreif; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Short-term recovery of balance control after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vipul Lugade; Virginia Klausmeier; Brian Jewett; Dennis Collis; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  B Fink
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 5.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcus Hofbauer; Gerald E Wozasek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Extracortical plate fixation with new plate inserts and cerclage wires for the treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures.

Authors:  Johannes D Bastian; Andre Butscher; Gianni Bigolin; Matthias A Zumstein; Hubert P Nötzli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Periprosthetic femur fractures treated with modular fluted, tapered stems.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; David G Lewallen; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur: the stability of the implant dictates the type of treatment.

Authors:  Francesco Biggi; Stefano Di Fabio; Corrado D'Antimo; Silvia Trevisani
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03

10.  Cement-in-cement stem revision for Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. A 3-year follow-up of 23 cases.

Authors:  Toby W Briant-Evans; Darmaraja Veeramootoo; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Matthew J Hubble
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.