Literature DB >> 25128966

Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Sandra Boesmueller1, Marc Michel, Marcus Hofbauer, Patrick Platzer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In case of stem loosening in periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF), revision arthroplasty should be performed. The first hypothesis of this study was that advanced patient age and female gender shows higher non-union rates. The second hypothesis was that primary cementless arthroplasty is associated with a higher non-union rate compared to cemented primary hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: All PPFF occurring between January 2000 and June 2010 treated by revision arthroplasty were included. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify independent variables leading to fracture non-union.
RESULTS: Eighty one patients (78 % female) met the inclusion criteria. In 20/81 patients (24.7 %) no adequate fracture healing could be determined on radiographs 12 months after revision surgery. Although age and female gender showed a positive correlation with bony non-union after PPFF as expected, the p-values were not statistically significant. Multiple regression analysis revealed primary cementless prosthesis (p = 0.001) to be the only independent variable associated with non-union.
CONCLUSION: Non-cemented primary prosthesis might be a negative predicting factor for the development of non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in PPFF. We therefore recommend the thorough debridement of pannus tissue thus inducing bone healing before the implantation of revision prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128966     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2489-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  36 in total

1.  Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of vancouver type B2 and B3.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Joachim Singer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Intramedullary nailing and reaming for delayed union or nonunion of the femoral shaft. A report of 105 consecutive cases.

Authors:  L X Webb; R A Winquist; S T Hansen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

4.  Biomechanical performance of different cable and wire cerclage configurations.

Authors:  Mark Lenz; Stephan Marcel Perren; Robert Geoff Richards; Thomas Mückley; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Boyko Gueorguiev; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  R M D Meek; T Norwood; R Smith; I J Brenkel; C R Howie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

6.  A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures--stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures.

Authors:  George Pavlou; Pavlos Panteliadis; David Macdonald; John A Timperley; Graham Gie; Gordon Bancroft; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 7.  Reamed intramedullary nailing versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for shaft fracture of femur: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Xin Duan; Tao Li; Al-Qwbani Mohammed; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients.

Authors:  Cibu Mukundan; Faizal Rayan; Ehab Kheir; D Macdonald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements.

Authors:  Eleftherios Tsiridis; Fares S Haddad; Graham A Gie
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  3 in total

1.  Has a patient type with peri-prosthetic femoral fractures evolved?

Authors:  Matthieu Ehlinger; David Bahlau; Michel Rahme; Philippe Adam; François Bonnomet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Authors:  Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Factors influencing results and complications in proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: a retrospective study at 1- to 8-year follow-up.

Authors:  Chiara Concina; Marina Crucil; Franco Gherlinzoni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-07-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.