Literature DB >> 28035429

History of internal fixation with plates (part 2): new developments after World War II; compressing plates and locked plates.

Philippe Hernigou1, Jacques Pariat2.   

Abstract

The first techniques of operative fracture with plates were developed in the 19th century. In fact, at the beginning these methods consisted of an open reduction of the fracture usually followed by a very unstable fixation. As a consequence, the fracture had to be opened with a real risk of (sometimes lethal) infection, and due to unstable fixation, protection with a cast was often necessary. During the period between World Wars I and II, plates for fracture fixation developed with great variety. It became increasingly recognised that, because a fracture of a long bone normally heals with minimal resorption at the bone ends, this may result in slight shortening and collapse, so a very rigid plate might prevent such collapse. However, as a consequence, delayed healing was observed unless the patient was lucky enough to have the plate break. One way of dealing with this was to use a slotted plate in which the screws could move axially, but the really important advance was recognition of the role of compression. After the first description of compression by Danis with a "coapteur", Bagby and Müller with the AO improved the technique of compression. The classic dynamic compression plates from the 1970s were the key to a very rigid fixation, leading to primary bone healing. Nevertheless, the use of strong plates resulted in delayed union and the osteoporosis, cancellous bone, comminution, and/or pathological bone resulted in some failures due to insufficient stability. Finally, new devices represented by locking plates increased the stability, contributing to the principles of a more biological osteosynthesis while giving enough stability to allow immediate full weight bearing in some patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bagby; Compression; Danis; Fracture plate; Locked plates; Müller; Screws

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035429     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3379-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  49 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

2.  Comparison of two different locking plates for two-, three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures--results of an international multicentre study.

Authors:  Gerhard Konrad; Anja Hirschmüller; Laurent Audige; Simon Lambert; Ralf Hertel; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The primary stability of angle-stable versus conventional locked intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Yves Stolarczyk; Konrad L Hoffmeier; Michael J Raschke; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Mückley
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Positive pressure in arthrodesis of the knee joint.

Authors:  J C CHARNLEY
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1948-08

5.  Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Authors:  Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Arthroplasty compared to internal fixation by locking plate osteosynthesis in comminuted fractures of the distal humerus.

Authors:  Alexander Ellwein; Helmut Lill; Christine Voigt; Pauline Wirtz; Gunnar Jensen; Jan Christoph Katthagen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Refractures: a consequence of impaired local bone viability.

Authors:  S B Kessler; S Deiler; M Schiffl-Deiler; H K Uhthoff; L Schweiberer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Locking-plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing for fixation of olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Tobias E Nowak; Klaus J Burkhart; Torsten Andres; Sven O Dietz; Daniela Klitscher; Lars P Mueller; Pol M Rommens
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Locking plates: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Wade R Smith; Bruce H Ziran; Jeffrey O Anglen; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2008

10.  Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Ulrich Dieter; Gwidon Stachowiak; André Gächter; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Osteoimmunology in Bone Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Takehito Ono; Hiroshi Takayanagi
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Does a Customized 3D Printing Plate Based on Virtual Reduction Facilitate the Restoration of Original Anatomy in Fractures?

Authors:  Seung-Han Shin; Moo-Sub Kim; Do-Kun Yoon; Jae-Jin Lee; Yang-Guk Chung
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Reconstruction of composite leg defects post-war injury.

Authors:  Reem A Karami; Fadi M Ghieh; Rawad S Chalhoub; Said S Saghieh; Suhail A Lakkis; Amir E Ibrahim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [Aftercare following surgical treatment of ankle fractures : What is the current state of knowledge?]

Authors:  K Rellensmann; S F Baumbach; W Böcker; H Polzer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Tobacco and bone fractures: A review of the facts and issues that every orthopaedic surgeon should know.

Authors:  J Hernigou; F Schuind
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Grand Challenges in Oral Surgery.

Authors:  Adalberto L Rosa; Emanuela P Ferraz
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.