Literature DB >> 21288467

Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones.

L Konstantinidis1, O Hauschild, N A Beckmann, A Hirschmüller, N P Südkamp, P Helwig.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis techniques has provided us a further means to treat periprosthetic femoral fractures. The goal of this experimental study is to evaluate the biomechanical properties and stability of treated periprosthetic fractures when using two different plate systems, which vary in the locking mechanism and the screw placement (monocortical or bicortical) with respect to the prosthesis stem.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using five pairs of formalin-fixed femora, a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture was treated either with a 13-hole LISS(®) titanium plate using four monocortical periprosthetic screws or with a non-contact bridging plate (NCB) DF(®) plate using bicortical angle-stable blocked screws positioned ventrally or dorsally to the prosthesis stem. Bones were loaded under axial and cyclic compression with a progressively increased load until failure. Displacement at the osteotomy gap was measured during loading using an ultra-sound measuring system.
RESULTS: The mean displacement in the region of the fracture gap was not significantly different at any time during the experiments for the two models. The mean force resulting in subsequent model failure was similar in both models; the failure morphology varied slightly between the models, however. Four of the five LISS(®) models exhibited either a tear-out of the monocortical screws or a decortication from the bony shaft of the cortical lamella surrounding the screws. On the other side, two of the NCB models showed macroscopically visible fissures along the osteosynthesis plates at the height of the osteotomy gap, and were hence considered implant failures. Only one NCB model showed tear-out of the bicortically placed screws.
CONCLUSION: Bicortical screw placement provides more stable anchoring when compared to monocortical screw fixation. However, in relation to the amount of motion at the osteotomy gap and to failure loads, stabilisation of periprosthetic femoral fractures can be equally well achieved using either the LISS(®) plate with periprosthetic monocortical screws or the NCB plate with poly-axially placed bicortical screws.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21288467     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  16 in total

1.  The locking attachment plate for proximal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures--a biomechanical comparison of two techniques.

Authors:  Mark Lenz; Markus Windolf; Thomas Mückley; Gunther O Hofmann; Michael Wagner; Robert G Richards; Karsten Schwieger; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Treatment of periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures : modern plate osteosynthesis procedures].

Authors:  M J Raschke; R Stange; C Kösters
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  High union rates of locking compression plating with cortical strut allograft for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ingwon Yeo; Kee-Hyung Rhyu; Sang-Min Kim; Yoon-Soo Park; Seung-Jae Lim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Richard Schröder; Martin Schulze; Peter Westerhoff; Michael Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Authors:  Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Tangential Bicortical Locked Fixation Improves Stability in Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Cyrus T Caroom; Hwabok Wee; Darin Jurgensmeier; Shane D Rothermel; Michelle A Bramer; John Spence Reid
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Marc Hanschen; Ina M Aschenbrenner; Kai Fehske; Sonja Kirchhoff; Leonhard Keil; Boris M Holzapfel; Sebastian Winkler; Bernd Fuechtmeier; Rainer Neugebauer; Sven Luehrs; Ulrich Liener; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Extracortical plate fixation with new plate inserts and cerclage wires for the treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures.

Authors:  Johannes D Bastian; Andre Butscher; Gianni Bigolin; Matthias A Zumstein; Hubert P Nötzli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; C Papaioannou; P Blanke; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.