Literature DB >> 27942525

Are long stimulus pulse durations the answer to improving spatial resolution in retinal prostheses?

Matthew A Petoe1, Mohit N Shivdasani1.   

Abstract

Retinal prostheses can provide artificial vision to patients with degenerate retinae by electrically stimulating the remaining inner retinal neurons. The evoked perception is generally adequate for light localization, but of limited spatial resolution owing to the indiscriminate activation of multiple retinal cell types, leading to distortions in the perceived image. Here we present a perspective on a recent work by Weitz and colleagues who demonstrate a focal confinement of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) activation when using extended pulse durations in the stimulation waveform. Using real-time calcium imaging, they provide evidence that long pulse durations selectively stimulate inner retinal neurons, whilst avoiding unwanted axonal activations. The application of this stimulation technique may provide enhanced spatial resolution for retinal prosthesis users. These experiments provide a robust analysis of the effects of increasing pulse duration and introduce the potential for alternative stimulation paradigms in retinal prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Retinal prostheses; calcium imaging; retina; retinitis pigmentosa (RP); spatial resolution

Year:  2016        PMID: 27942525      PMCID: PMC5124616          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.11.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  24 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the brain. III. The neural damage model.

Authors:  R H Pudenz; L A Bullara; S Jacques; F T Hambrecht
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Pathology of damaging electrical stimulation in the retina.

Authors:  L Colodetti; J D Weiland; S Colodetti; A Ray; M J Seiler; D R Hinton; M S Humayun
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  A Butterwick; A Vankov; P Huie; Y Freyvert; D Palanker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Experimental nondestructive electrical stimulation of the brain and spinal cord.

Authors:  J T Mortimer; C N Shealy; C Wheeler
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Ofer R Ziv; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The Appearance of Phosphenes Elicited Using a Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Nicholas C Sinclair; Mohit N Shivdasani; Thushara Perera; Lisa N Gillespie; Hugh J McDermott; Lauren N Ayton; Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Spatiotemporal interactions in retinal prosthesis subjects.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS--Clinical trial interim report.

Authors:  Katarina Stingl; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Dorothea Besch; Caroline K Chee; Charles L Cottriall; Florian Gekeler; Markus Groppe; Timothy L Jackson; Robert E MacLaren; Assen Koitschev; Akos Kusnyerik; James Neffendorf; Janos Nemeth; Mohamed Adheem Naser Naeem; Tobias Peters; James D Ramsden; Helmut Sachs; Andrew Simpson; Mandeep S Singh; Barbara Wilhelm; David Wong; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.