Literature DB >> 31866339

An update on retinal prostheses.

Lauren N Ayton1, Nick Barnes2, Gislin Dagnelie3, Takashi Fujikado4, Georges Goetz5, Ralf Hornig6, Bryan W Jones7, Mahiul M K Muqit8, Daniel L Rathbun9, Katarina Stingl10, James D Weiland11, Matthew A Petoe12.   

Abstract

Retinal prostheses are designed to restore a basic sense of sight to people with profound vision loss. They require a relatively intact posterior visual pathway (optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex). Retinal implants are options for people with severe stages of retinal degenerative disease such as retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration. There have now been three regulatory-approved retinal prostheses. Over five hundred patients have been implanted globally over the past 15 years. Devices generally provide an improved ability to localize high-contrast objects, navigate, and perform basic orientation tasks. Adverse events have included conjunctival erosion, retinal detachment, loss of light perception, and the need for revision surgery, but are rare. There are also specific device risks, including overstimulation (which could cause damage to the retina) or delamination of implanted components, but these are very unlikely. Current challenges include how to improve visual acuity, enlarge the field-of-view, and reduce a complex visual scene to its most salient components through image processing. This review encompasses the work of over 40 individual research groups who have built devices, developed stimulation strategies, or investigated the basic physiology underpinning retinal prostheses. Current technologies are summarized, along with future challenges that face the field.
Copyright © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ophthalmology; Retinal disease; Retinal prosthesis; Vision restoration

Year:  2019        PMID: 31866339      PMCID: PMC7198351          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  107 in total

Review 1.  Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Vision function testing for a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: effects of image filtering.

Authors:  Nick Barnes; Adele F Scott; Paulette Lieby; Matthew A Petoe; Chris McCarthy; Ashley Stacey; Lauren N Ayton; Nicholas C Sinclair; Mohit N Shivdasani; Nigel H Lovell; Hugh J McDermott; Janine G Walker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Temporal properties of visual perception on electrical stimulation of the retina.

Authors:  Angélica Pérez Fornos; Jörg Sommerhalder; Lyndon da Cruz; Jose Alain Sahel; Saddek Mohand-Said; Farhad Hafezi; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Georges Goetz; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

6.  Perceptual efficacy of electrical stimulation of human retina with a microelectrode array during short-term surgical trials.

Authors:  Joseph F Rizzo; John Wyatt; John Loewenstein; Shawn Kelly; Doug Shire
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  The neuronal organization of the retina.

Authors:  Richard H Masland
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  First-in-human trial of a novel suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Peter J Blamey; Robyn H Guymer; Chi D Luu; David A X Nayagam; Nicholas C Sinclair; Mohit N Shivdasani; Jonathan Yeoh; Mark F McCombe; Robert J Briggs; Nicholas L Opie; Joel Villalobos; Peter N Dimitrov; Mary Varsamidis; Matthew A Petoe; Chris D McCarthy; Janine G Walker; Nick Barnes; Anthony N Burkitt; Chris E Williams; Robert K Shepherd; Penelope J Allen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa: results from the TESOLAUK trial.

Authors:  Siegfried K Wagner; Jasleen K Jolly; Maria Pefkianaki; Florian Gekeler; Andrew R Webster; Susan M Downes; Robert E Maclaren
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-14

10.  An analysis of observer-rated functional vision in patients implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System at three years.

Authors:  Duane R Geruschat; Thomas P Richards; Aries Arditi; Lyndon da Cruz; Gislin Dagnelie; Jessy D Dorn; Jacque L Duncan; Allen C Ho; Lisa C Olmos de Koo; José-Alain Sahel; Paulo E Stanga; Gabriele Thumann; Vizhong Wang; Robert J Greenberg
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 2.742

View more
  28 in total

1.  Controlled assembly of retinal cells on fractal and Euclidean electrodes.

Authors:  Saba Moslehi; Conor Rowland; Julian H Smith; William J Watterson; David Miller; Cristopher M Niell; Benjamín J Alemán; Maria-Thereza Perez; Richard P Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Immersive Virtual Reality Simulations of Bionic Vision.

Authors:  Justin Kasowski; Michael Beyeler
Journal:  Augment Hum (2022)       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 3.  Visual neuroprosthesis: present and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jan Lestak; Jiri Chod; Jozef Rosina; Karel Hana
Journal:  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 1.648

Review 4.  Regenerative and restorative medicine for eye disease.

Authors:  Russell N Van Gelder; Michael F Chiang; Michael A Dyer; Thomas N Greenwell; Leonard A Levin; Rachel O Wong; Clive N Svendsen
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 87.241

5.  A Computational Model of Phosphene Appearance for Epiretinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Jacob Granley; Michael Beyeler
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2021-11

6.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

7.  Multisensory perception in Argus II retinal prosthesis patients: Leveraging auditory-visual mappings to enhance prosthesis outcomes.

Authors:  Noelle R B Stiles; Vivek R Patel; James D Weiland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Model-based comparison of current flow in rod bipolar cells of healthy and early-stage degenerated retina.

Authors:  Pragya Kosta; Ege Iseri; Kyle Loizos; Javad Paknahad; Rebecca L Pfeiffer; Crystal L Sigulinsky; James R Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.770

9.  An electroactive hybrid biointerface for enhancing neuronal differentiation and axonal outgrowth on bio-subretinal chip.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Yang; Chong-You Chen; Zih-Yu Yu; Johnson H Y Chung; Xiao Liu; Chung-Yu Wu; Guan-Yu Chen
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 10.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.