Literature DB >> 34710857

Spatially patterned bi-electrode epiretinal stimulation for axon avoidance at cellular resolution.

Ramandeep S Vilkhu1, Sasidhar S Madugula2, Lauren E Grosberg2, Alex R Gogliettino2, Pawel Hottowy3, Wladyslaw Dabrowski3, Alexander Sher4, Alan M Litke4, Subhasish Mitra1, E J Chichilnisky2.   

Abstract

Objective.Epiretinal prostheses are designed to restore vision to people blinded by photoreceptor degenerative diseases by stimulating surviving retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which carry visual signals to the brain. However, inadvertent stimulation of RGCs at their axons can result in non-focal visual percepts, limiting the quality of artificial vision. Theoretical work has suggested that axon activation can be avoided with current stimulation designed to minimize the second spatial derivative of the induced extracellular voltage along the axon. However, this approach has not been verified experimentally at the resolution of single cells.Approach.In this work, a custom multi-electrode array (512 electrodes, 10μm diameter, 60μm pitch) was used to stimulate and record RGCs in macaque retinaex vivoat single-cell, single-spike resolution. RGC activation thresholds resulting from bi-electrode stimulation, which consisted of bipolar currents simultaneously delivered through two electrodes straddling an axon, were compared to activation thresholds from traditional single-electrode stimulation.Main results.On average, across three retinal preparations, the bi-electrode stimulation strategy reduced somatic activation thresholds (∼21%) while increasing axonal activation thresholds (∼14%), thus favoring selective somatic activation. Furthermore, individual examples revealed rescued selective activation of somas that was not possible with any individual electrode.Significance.This work suggests that a bi-electrode epiretinal stimulation strategy can reduce inadvertent axonal activation at cellular resolution, for high-fidelity artificial vision.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axon activation; cellular resolution; epiretinal prosthesis; retinal electrophysiology; retinal ganglion cells; spatially-patterned stimulation strategy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34710857      PMCID: PMC8736333          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  37 in total

1.  Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Authors:  Devyani Nanduri; Ione Fine; Alan Horsager; Geoffrey M Boynton; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; James D Weiland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Virtual electrodes by current steering in retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Gerald Dumm; James B Fallon; Chris E Williams; Mohit N Shivdasani
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Anatomical identification of extracellularly recorded cells in large-scale multielectrode recordings.

Authors:  Peter H Li; Jeffrey L Gauthier; Max Schiff; Alexander Sher; Daniel Ahn; Greg D Field; Martin Greschner; Edward M Callaway; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Action potentials in retinal ganglion cells are initiated at the site of maximal curvature of the extracellular potential.

Authors:  Max Eickenscheidt; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Analysis of models for external stimulation of axons.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Minimizing axon bundle activation of retinal ganglion cells with oriented rectangular electrodes.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Maryam Hejazi; David J Garrett; Timothy Esler; Steven Prawer; Hamish Meffin; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with an ultrafine, extracellular microelectrode.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo; Ofer R Ziv; Andrew Grumet; John Wyatt
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Minimizing activation of overlying axons with epiretinal stimulation: The role of fiber orientation and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Timothy B Esler; Robert R Kerr; Bahman Tahayori; David B Grayden; Hamish Meffin; Anthony N Burkitt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  A simple model considering spiking probability during extracellular axon stimulation.

Authors:  Frank Rattay; Thomas Tanzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Factors affecting two-point discrimination in Argus II patients.

Authors:  Ezgi I Yücel; Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Sandra Rocio Montezuma; Gislin Dagnelie; Ariel Rokem; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine; Michael Beyeler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.