Literature DB >> 21628768

Calcium channel dynamics limit synaptic release in response to prosthetic stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms.

Daniel K Freeman1, Jed S Jeng, Shawn K Kelly, Espen Hartveit, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

Extracellular electric stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms has been shown to allow preferential activation of individual types of retinal neurons by varying stimulus frequency. It is important to understand the mechanisms underlying this frequency dependence as a step toward improving methods of preferential activation. In order to elucidate these mechanisms, we implemented a morphologically realistic model of a retinal bipolar cell and measured the response to extracellular stimulation with sinusoidal waveforms. We compared the frequency response of a passive membrane model to the kinetics of voltage-gated calcium channels that mediate synaptic release. The passive electrical properties of the membrane exhibited lowpass filtering with a relatively high cutoff frequency (nominal value = 717 Hz). This cutoff frequency was dependent on intra-axonal resistance, with shorter and wider axons yielding higher cutoff frequencies. However, we found that the cutoff frequency of bipolar cell synaptic release was primarily limited by the relatively slow opening kinetics of L- and T-type calcium channels. The cutoff frequency of calcium currents depended nonlinearly on stimulus amplitude, but remained lower than the cutoff frequency of the passive membrane model for a large range of membrane potential fluctuations. These results suggest that while it may be possible to modulate the membrane potential of bipolar cells over a wide range of stimulus frequencies, synaptic release will only be initiated at the lower end of this range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21628768      PMCID: PMC3152377          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  66 in total

1.  Light-evoked responses of bipolar cells in a mammalian retina.

Authors:  T Euler; R H Masland
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional architecture of synapses in the inner retina: segregation of visual signals by stratification of bipolar cell axon terminals.

Authors:  S M Wu; F Gao; B R Maple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Passive membrane properties and electrotonic signal processing in retinal rod bipolar cells.

Authors:  Leif Oltedal; Margaret Lin Veruki; Espen Hartveit
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Electric field stimulation of bipolar cells in a degenerated retina--a theoretical study.

Authors:  Matthias Gerhardt; John Alderman; Alfred Stett
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Functional stability of retinal ganglion cells after degeneration-induced changes in synaptic input.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Gregory Newkirk; Thomas Euler; Peter B Detwiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Direct activation and temporal response properties of rabbit retinal ganglion cells following subretinal stimulation.

Authors:  David Tsai; John W Morley; Gregg J Suaning; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis.

Authors:  Gerald J Chader; James Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 8.  Eye smarter than scientists believed: neural computations in circuits of the retina.

Authors:  Tim Gollisch; Markus Meister
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Differential expression of three T-type calcium channels in retinal bipolar cells in rats.

Authors:  Caiping Hu; Anding Bi; Zhuo-Hua Pan
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Retinal ganglion cells survive and maintain normal dendritic morphology in a mouse model of inherited photoreceptor degeneration.

Authors:  Francesca Mazzoni; Elena Novelli; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  15 in total

1.  Responses to pulsatile subretinal electric stimulation: effects of amplitude and duration.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Donald K Eddington; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The Retinal Response to Sinusoidal Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 3.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Increasing Electrical Stimulation Efficacy in Degenerated Retina: Stimulus Waveform Design in a Multiscale Computational Model.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Robert Marc; Mark Humayun; James R Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  A multi-scale computational model for the study of retinal prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Gianluca Lazzi; J Scott Lauritzen; James Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Robert Marc
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

6.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Paired-pulse plasticity in the strength and latency of light-evoked lateral inhibition to retinal bipolar cell terminals.

Authors:  Evan Vickers; Mean-Hwan Kim; Jozsef Vigh; Henrique von Gersdorff
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  On the computation of a retina resistivity profile for applications in multi-scale modeling of electrical stimulation and absorption.

Authors:  Kyle Loizos; Anil Kumar RamRakhyani; James Anderson; Robert Marc; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

10.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.