Literature DB >> 25787954

The influence of cochlear spectral processing on the timing and amplitude of the speech-evoked auditory brain stem response.

Helen E Nuttall1, David R Moore2, Johanna G Barry3, Katrin Krumbholz3, Jessica de Boer4.   

Abstract

The speech-evoked auditory brain stem response (speech ABR) is widely considered to provide an index of the quality of neural temporal encoding in the central auditory pathway. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the extent to which the speech ABR is shaped by spectral processing in the cochlea. High-pass noise masking was used to record speech ABRs from delimited octave-wide frequency bands between 0.5 and 8 kHz in normal-hearing young adults. The latency of the frequency-delimited responses decreased from the lowest to the highest frequency band by up to 3.6 ms. The observed frequency-latency function was compatible with model predictions based on wave V of the click ABR. The frequency-delimited speech ABR amplitude was largest in the 2- to 4-kHz frequency band and decreased toward both higher and lower frequency bands despite the predominance of low-frequency energy in the speech stimulus. We argue that the frequency dependence of speech ABR latency and amplitude results from the decrease in cochlear filter width with decreasing frequency. The results suggest that the amplitude and latency of the speech ABR may reflect interindividual differences in cochlear, as well as central, processing. The high-pass noise-masking technique provides a useful tool for differentiating between peripheral and central effects on the speech ABR. It can be used for further elucidating the neural basis of the perceptual speech deficits that have been associated with individual differences in speech ABR characteristics.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory filter; auditory temporal processing; cochlear response time; speech-evoked auditory brain stem response; speech-in-noise

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25787954      PMCID: PMC4468972          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00548.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

Review 1.  Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  N P Cooper; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Auditory processing, speech perception and phonological ability in pre-school children at high-risk for dyslexia: a longitudinal study of the auditory temporal processing theory.

Authors:  Bart Boets; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen; Pol Ghesquière
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Bradford C Backus; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-12

5.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; A Masuda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The effects of sensory hearing loss on cochlear filter times estimated from auditory brainstem response latencies.

Authors:  M Don; C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; B Kwong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.

Authors:  M S Sommers; L E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Olaf Strelcyk; Dimitrios Christoforidis; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses.

Authors:  Le Wang; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  The Role of Age-Related Declines in Subcortical Auditory Processing in Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Tim Schoof; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-23

4.  Speech Auditory Brainstem Responses: Effects of Background, Stimulus Duration, Consonant-Vowel, and Number of Epochs.

Authors:  Ghada BinKhamis; Agnès Léger; Steven L Bell; Garreth Prendergast; Martin O'Driscoll; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Relations between speech-reception, psychophysical temporal processing, and subcortical electrophysiological measures of auditory function in humans.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Noise-Induced Changes of the Auditory Brainstem Response to Speech-a Measure of Neural Desynchronisation?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Helen E Nuttall; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.