Literature DB >> 8315154

Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.

M S Sommers1, L E Humes.   

Abstract

To dissociate the effects of age and hearing impairment on changes in frequency selectivity, auditory filter shapes were measured at 2 kHz in four groups of subjects: (1) normal-hearing young subjects; (2) normal-hearing elderly subjects; (3) elderly hearing-impaired listeners; and (4) young normal-hearing listeners with simulated hearing losses. Filter shapes were derived using a modified version of the notched-noise procedure [Glasberg and Moore, Hear, Res. 47, 103-138 (1990)]. Equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs) of auditory filters were not significantly different in young and elderly subjects with normal 2-kHz hearing. Furthermore, filter widths for young subjects with 20- and 40-dB simulated hearing losses overlapped with those obtained from elderly subjects with corresponding degrees of actual hearing loss. One measure that did show significant differences between actual and simulated hearing losses was the degree of filter asymmetry; auditory filters in hearing-impaired listeners were more asymmetrical than those obtained from noise-masked normal-hearing subjects. The dynamic range of auditory filters, however, was comparable for hearing-impaired and noise-masked listeners. Lastly, post-filter detection efficiency was also similar for young and elderly subjects with equivalent hearing levels. These findings suggest that the reduced frequency selectivity often reported for older listeners can be attributed, primarily, to hearing loss rather than increased age. Implications of the results for speech perception in the elderly and models of hearing impairment are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315154     DOI: 10.1121/1.405810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

3.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Frederick J Gallun; Marjorie R Leek; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Rajeswari Sivakumar; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

8.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Spectral tilt change in stop consonant perception by listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Measures of hearing threshold and temporal processing across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Diane Kewley-Port; Daniel Fogerty; Dana Kinney
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.