Literature DB >> 19045789

Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Claus Elberling1, Manuel Don.   

Abstract

In an attempt to compensate for the temporal dispersion in the human cochlea, a chirp has previously been designed from estimates of the cochlear delay based on derived-band auditory brain-stem response (ABR) latencies [Elberling et al. (2007). "Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 2772-2785]. To evaluate intersubject variability and level effects of such delay estimates, a large dataset is analyzed from 81 normal-hearing adults (fixed click level) and from a subset thereof (different click levels). At a fixed click level, the latency difference between 5700 and 710 Hz ranges from about 2.0 to 5.0 ms, but over a range of 60 dB, the mean relative delay is almost constant. Modeling experiments demonstrate that the derived-band latencies depend on the cochlear filter buildup time and on the unit response waveform. Because these quantities are partly unknown, the relationship between the derived-band latencies and the basilar membrane group delay cannot be specified. A chirp based on the above delay estimates is used to record ABRs in ten normal-hearing adults (20 ears). For levels below 60 dB nHL, the gain in amplitude of chirp-ABRs to click-ABRs approaches 2, and the effectiveness of chirp-ABRs compares favorably to Stacked-ABRs obtained under similar conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045789      PMCID: PMC2677350          DOI: 10.1121/1.2990709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion.

Authors:  T Dau; O Wegner; V Mellert; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Synthetic whole-nerve action potentials for the cat.

Authors:  E de Boer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Compound action potentials: tuning curves and delay times.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1979

4.  Frequency specific components of the cochlear nerve and brainstem evoked responses of the human auditory system.

Authors:  D J Parker; A R Thornton
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1978

5.  Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking.

Authors:  M Don; J J Eggermont
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On cochlear encoding: potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique.

Authors:  E de Boer; H R de Jongh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Systematic errors in indirect estimates of basilar membrane travel times.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporal position of discharges in single auditory nerve fibers within the cycle of a sine-wave stimulus: frequency and intensity effects.

Authors:  D J Anderson; J E Rose; J E Hind; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain stem responses and high-pass noise masking.

Authors:  M Don; J J Eggermont; D E Brackmann
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1979 May-Jun

10.  Input and output compensation for the cochlear traveling wave delay in wide-band ABR recordings: implications for small acoustic tumor detection.

Authors:  Manuel Don; Claus Elberling; Erin Maloff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  23 in total

1.  [On the terminology of auditory steady-state responses. What differentiates steady-state and transient potentials?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Auditory brainstem responses to chirps delivered by different insert earphones.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Sinnet G B Kristensen; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluating auditory brainstem responses to different chirp stimuli at three levels of stimulation.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Johannes Callø; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Bo-Chen Wang; Yong Liang; Xiao-Long Liu; Jing Zhao; You-Li Liu; Yan-Fei Li; Wei Zhang; Qi Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther; Mario Cebulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

9.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  [Objective diagnostic methods in pediatric audiology].

Authors:  R Mühler; S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.