Literature DB >> 30826519

Assessing Cochlear-Place Specific Temporal Coding Using Multi-Band Complex Tones to Measure Envelope-Following Responses.

Le Wang1, Hari Bharadwaj2, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham3.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that envelope-following responses (EFRs) reveal important differences in temporal coding fidelity amongst listeners who have normal hearing thresholds, consistent with these listeners differing in the degree to which they suffer from cochlear synaptopathy. Like conventional hearing loss, the severity of cochlear synaptopathy may vary along the cochlea. A number of earlier studies have suggested methods for estimating EFRs driven by specific frequency regions of the cochlea, which would allow synaptopathy to be estimated as a function of cochlear place. Here, we tested a method for measuring EFRs from multiple locations along the cochlea simultaneously, using narrowband stimuli. We compared responses to multiple simultaneous narrowband complex harmonic tones in three non-overlapping frequency bands, each having a unique fundamental frequency, to responses to the individual narrowband stimuli alone, and to responses when noise was added to different combinations of the frequency bands. Our results suggest that simultaneous presentation of multiple tone complexes with different fundamental frequencies leads to repeatable measures of temporal coding fidelity at the cochlear frequency regions corresponding to the narrowband carrier frequencies. Other results suggested that while off-frequency contributions to EFRs driven by narrowband signals (due to spread of excitation) can add destructively to the on frequency response, these interactions were small compared to EFR magnitude. Overall, our results point to the utility of using multi-band complex tone stimuli to estimate the profile of temporal coding fidelity, and thus the degree of synaptopathy, as a function of cochlear place. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, Central Gain.
Copyright © 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear synaptopathy; coding fidelity; hidden hearing loss; spread of excitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826519      PMCID: PMC6513718          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  26 in total

1.  Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Oliver Wegner; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The frequency-following response and the onset response: evaluation of frequency specificity using a forward-masking paradigm.

Authors:  A K Ananthanarayan; J D Durrant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Phase-locked responses to the vowel envelope vary in scalp-recorded amplitude due to across-frequency response interactions.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Ashlee Banyard; Steven J Aiken; David W Purcell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Updated parameters and expanded simulation options for a model of the auditory periphery.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise.

Authors:  T W Picton; J Ouellette; G Hamel; A D Smith
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1979-08

7.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09

8.  Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking.

Authors:  M Don; J J Eggermont
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp.

Authors:  R Galambos; S Makeig; P J Talmachoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Steven Aiken; Krystal Beh; Emma McGrath; Mary Galloy; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-24

2.  AudioChip: A Deep Phenotyping Approach for Deconstructing and Quantifying Audiological Phenotypes of Self-Reported Speech Perception Difficulties.

Authors:  Ishan Sunilkumar Bhatt; Raquel Dias; Nathan Wineinger; Sheila Pratt; Jin Wang; Nilesh Washnik; O'neil Guthrie; Jason Wilder; Ali Torkamani
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 3.  Animal-to-Human Translation Difficulties and Problems With Proposed Coding-in-Noise Deficits in Noise-Induced Synaptopathy and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Sara Ripley; Li Xia; Zhen Zhang; Steve J Aiken; Jian Wang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Noninvasive Measures of Distorted Tonotopic Speech Coding Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.