Literature DB >> 30853540

Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Hari M Bharadwaj1, Alexandra R Mai2, Jennifer M Simpson2, Inyong Choi3, Michael G Heinz4, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham5.   

Abstract

Studies in multiple species, including in post-mortem human tissue, have shown that normal aging and/or acoustic overexposure can lead to a significant loss of afferent synapses innervating the cochlea. Hypothetically, this cochlear synaptopathy can lead to perceptual deficits in challenging environments and can contribute to central neural effects such as tinnitus. However, because cochlear synaptopathy can occur without any measurable changes in audiometric thresholds, synaptopathy can remain hidden from standard clinical diagnostics. To understand the perceptual sequelae of synaptopathy and to evaluate the efficacy of emerging therapies, sensitive and specific non-invasive measures at the individual patient level need to be established. Pioneering experiments in specific mice strains have helped identify many candidate assays. These include auditory brainstem responses, the middle-ear muscle reflex, envelope-following responses, and extended high-frequency audiograms. Unfortunately, because these non-invasive measures can be also affected by extraneous factors other than synaptopathy, their application and interpretation in humans is not straightforward. Here, we systematically examine six extraneous factors through a series of interrelated human experiments aimed at understanding their effects. Using strategies that may help mitigate the effects of such extraneous factors, we then show that these suprathreshold physiological assays exhibit across-individual correlations with each other indicative of contributions from a common physiological source consistent with cochlear synaptopathy. Finally, we discuss the application of these assays to two key outstanding questions, and discuss some barriers that still remain. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, Hyperacusis, Central Gain.
Copyright © 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory brainstem response; cochlear synaptopathy; envelope-following response; hidden-hearing loss; individual differences; middle-ear muscle reflex

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30853540      PMCID: PMC6513698          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  94 in total

1.  Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; Otavio Lins; Patricia Van Roon; David R Stapells; Michael Scherg; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear neuropathy in human presbycusis: Confocal analysis of hidden hearing loss in post-mortem tissue.

Authors:  Lucas M Viana; Jennifer T O'Malley; Barbara J Burgess; Dianne D Jones; Carlos A C P Oliveira; Felipe Santos; Saumil N Merchant; Leslie D Liberman; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates.

Authors:  Adam C Furman; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Efferent feedback slows cochlear aging.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Leslie D Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Noise-induced inner hair cell ribbon loss disturbs central arc mobilization: a novel molecular paradigm for understanding tinnitus.

Authors:  Wibke Singer; Annalisa Zuccotti; Mirko Jaumann; Sze Chim Lee; Rama Panford-Walsh; Hao Xiong; Ulrike Zimmermann; Christoph Franz; Hyun-Soon Geisler; Iris Köpschall; Karin Rohbock; Ksenya Varakina; Sandrine Verpoorten; Thomas Reinbothe; Thomas Schimmang; Lukas Rüttiger; Marlies Knipper
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  The influence of cochlear spectral processing on the timing and amplitude of the speech-evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Helen E Nuttall; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Katrin Krumbholz; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Sarah Verhulst; Luke Shaheen; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21

Review 10.  Perceptual consequences of "hidden" hearing loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Daphne Barker; Garreth Prendergast
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  32 in total

1.  Electrophysiological markers of cochlear function correlate with hearing-in-noise performance among audiometrically normal subjects.

Authors:  Kelsie J Grant; Anita M Mepani; Peizhe Wu; Kenneth E Hancock; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Assessment of Hidden Hearing Loss in Normal Hearing Individuals with and Without Tinnitus.

Authors:  Eyyup Kara; Kübra Aydın; A Alperen Akbulut; Sare Nur Karakol; Serkan Durmaz; H Murat Yener; E Deniz Gözen; Halide Kara
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Audiologic characterization using clinical physiological measures: Normative data from macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Amy N Stahl; Jane A Mondul; Katy A Alek; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.672

4.  Could Tailored Chirp Stimuli Benefit Measurement of the Supra-threshold Auditory Brainstem Wave-I Response?

Authors:  Jessica de Boer; Alexander Hardy; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-19

5.  Noninvasive Measures of Distorted Tonotopic Speech Coding Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-13

6.  Neural auditory contrast enhancement in humans.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah Verhulst; Kenneth E Hancock; Markus Garrett; Viacheslav Vasilkov; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sara Momtaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Cochlear neural degeneration disrupts hearing in background noise by increasing auditory cortex internal noise.

Authors:  Jennifer Resnik; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Michelle D Valero; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.