Literature DB >> 7814764

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times.

M Don1, C W Ponton, J J Eggermont, A Masuda.   

Abstract

Previously, it was shown [Don et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 2135-2148 (1993)] that cochlear response times are gender specific and about 13% shorter in females than in males. It is also suggested that one of the possible reasons click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) waveforms recorded from females are better defined and have larger amplitudes than those of males is due to a sex difference in cochlear response times leading to better synchronization of the cochlear output across the frequency regions. Variability in cochlear response times would also lead to variability in click evoked ABR amplitudes. The high-pass noise masking derived ABR technique was used to investigate the effect of normalizing the individual temporal variability at the neural and cochlear levels. This involved adjusting for differences in neural conduction time (I-V delay) by a compression or expansion of the derived ABR waveforms and by adjusting for differences in cochlear response times by a shift of the derived ABR waveforms. A summation of the compressed and shifted ABRs results in a normalized unmasked ABR waveform that can then be compared for amplitude variability with the unprocessed unmasked ABRs. Compensation for the neutral I-V variability had little effect while compensation for cochlear response times, particularly the delay between the 5.7- and 2.8-kHz regions, greatly affected the amplitude of wave V of the compounded ABR. This work provides a better understanding of the significant relationship between cochlear response times and variability of the ABR peak amplitudes.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7814764     DOI: 10.1121/1.410608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A direct approach for the design of chirp stimuli used for the recording of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory brainstem responses to a chirp stimulus designed from derived-band latencies in normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  Claus Elberling; Manuel Don
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Interaural stacked auditory brainstem response measures for detecting small unilateral acoustic tumors.

Authors:  Manuel Don; Betty Kwong; Chiemi Tanaka
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Sex and gestational age effects on auditory brainstem responses in preterm and term infants.

Authors:  Mingyan Li; Li Zhu; Xiaoqin Mai; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff; Zhengyan Zhao
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Input and output compensation for the cochlear traveling wave delay in wide-band ABR recordings: implications for small acoustic tumor detection.

Authors:  Manuel Don; Claus Elberling; Erin Maloff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Pre- and postovulatory auditory brainstem response in normal women.

Authors:  Namrata Upadhayay; Bishnu Hari Paudel; Paras Nath Singh; Bal Krishna Bhattarai; Kopila Agrawal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-11-30

9.  Transient Otoacoustic Emissions and Auditory Brainstem Responses in Low-Risk Cohort of Newborn and One-Month-Old Infants: Assessment of Infant Auditory System Physiology in the Prenatal Alcohol in SIDS and Stillbirth Network Safe Passage Study.

Authors:  Yvonne S Sininger; Carmen G Condon; Howard J Hoffman; Amy J Elliott; Hein J Odendaal; Larry L Burd; Michael M Myers; William P Fifer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  The influence of cochlear spectral processing on the timing and amplitude of the speech-evoked auditory brain stem response.

Authors:  Helen E Nuttall; David R Moore; Johanna G Barry; Katrin Krumbholz; Jessica de Boer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.