Literature DB >> 17932717

Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions.

Bradford C Backus1, John J Guinan.   

Abstract

A clinical test for the strength of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) might be valuable as a predictor of individuals at risk for acoustic trauma or for explaining why some people have trouble understanding speech in noise. A first step in developing a clinical test for MOCR strength is to determine the range and variation of MOCR strength in a research setting. A measure of MOCR strength near 1 kHz was made across a normal-hearing population (N = 25) by monitoring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) while activating the MOCR with 60 dB SPL wideband contralateral noise. Statistically significant MOCR effects were measured in all 25 subjects; but not all SFOAE frequencies tested produced significant effects within the time allotted. To get a metric of MOCR strength, MOCR-induced changes in SFOAEs were normalized by the SFOAE amplitude obtained by two-tone suppression. We found this "normalized MOCR effect" varied across frequency and time within the same subject, sometimes with significant differences between measurements made as little as 40 Hz apart or as little as a few minutes apart. Averaging several single-frequency measures spanning 200 Hz in each subject reduced the frequency- and time-dependent variations enough to produce correlated measures indicative of the true MOCR strength near 1 kHz for each subject. The distribution of MOCR strengths, in terms of SFOAE suppression near 1 kHz, across our normal-hearing subject pool was reasonably approximated by a normal distribution with mean suppression of approximately 35% and standard deviation of approximately 12%. The range of MOCR strengths spanned a factor of 4, suggesting that whatever function the MOCR plays in hearing (e.g., enhancing signal detection in noise, reducing acoustic trauma), different people will have corresponding differences in their abilities to perform that function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932717      PMCID: PMC2538345          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0100-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  29 in total

1.  Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth.

Authors:  S Maison; C Micheyl; G Andéol; S Gallégo; L Collet
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure.

Authors:  C L Talmadge; A Tubis; G R Long; C Tong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical test set-up.

Authors:  G De Ceulaer; M Yperman; K Daemers; K Van Driessche; T Somers; F E Offeciers; P J Govaerts
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise.

Authors:  U Ajith Kumar; C S Vanaja
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Bradford C Backus; Watjana Lilaonitkul; Vered Aharonson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-13

6.  Acoustic emission cochleography--practical aspects.

Authors:  D T Kemp; P Bray; L Alexander; A M Brown
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1986

7.  Letter: Hypothesis on the function of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.

Authors:  C D Geisler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Crossed cochlear influences on monaural temporary threshold shifts.

Authors:  R Rajan; B M Johnstone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  D O Kim; P A Dorn; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-03

10.  Reduced auditory efferent activity in childhood selective mutism.

Authors:  Yair Bar-Haim; Yael Henkin; Daphne Ari-Even-Roth; Simona Tetin-Schneider; Minka Hildesheimer; Chava Muchnik
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

View more
  38 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Probing cochlear tuning and tonotopy in the tiger using otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Edward J Walsh; JoAnn McGee; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Medial olivocochlear-induced transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude shifts in individual subjects.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Ian B Mertes; James D Lewis; Diana K Weissbeck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-28

5.  Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.

Authors:  Lynne Marshall; Judi A Lapsley Miller; John J Guinan; Christopher A Shera; Charlotte M Reed; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Paul Boege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stability of the medial olivocochlear reflex as measured by distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Salwa Masud; Golbarg Mehraei; Sarah Verhulst; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Cristian Aedo; Alex León; Macarena Bowen; Natalia Jara; Gonzalo Terreros; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07

9.  Exploring the Role of Medial Olivocochlear Efferents on the Detection of Amplitude Modulation for Tones Presented in Noise.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Alix M Klang; Nathan T Torunsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-28

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.