Literature DB >> 19617560

Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception.

Jane Hornickel1, Erika Skoe, Trent Nicol, Steven Zecker, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Children with reading impairments have deficits in phonological awareness, phonemic categorization, speech-in-noise perception, and psychophysical tasks such as frequency and temporal discrimination. Many of these children also exhibit abnormal encoding of speech stimuli in the auditory brainstem, even though responses to click stimuli are normal. In typically developing children the auditory brainstem response reflects acoustic differences between contrastive stop consonants. The current study investigated whether this subcortical differentiation of stop consonants was related to reading ability and speech-in-noise performance. Across a group of children with a wide range of reading ability, the subcortical differentiation of 3 speech stimuli ([ba], [da], [ga]) was found to be correlated with phonological awareness, reading, and speech-in-noise perception, with better performers exhibiting greater differences among responses to the 3 syllables. When subjects were categorized into terciles based on phonological awareness and speech-in-noise performance, the top-performing third in each grouping had greater subcortical differentiation than the bottom third. These results are consistent with the view that the neural processes underlying phonological awareness and speech-in-noise perception depend on reciprocal interactions between cognitive and perceptual processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19617560      PMCID: PMC2722305          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901123106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

1.  The corticofugal system for hearing: recent progress.

Authors:  N Suga; E Gao; Y Zhang; X Ma; J F Olsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Deficits in auditory brainstem pathway encoding of speech sounds in children with learning problems.

Authors:  Cynthia King; Catherine M Warrier; Erin Hayes; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Thomas Elbert; Aditi Lahiri; Carsten Eulitz
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-02

4.  Reward-dependent plasticity in the primary auditory cortex of adult monkeys trained to discriminate temporally modulated signals.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner; Steven W Cheung; Xiaoqin Wang; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment.

Authors:  April A Benasich; Paula Tallal
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Temporal processing and phonological impairment in dyslexia: effect of phoneme lengthening on order judgment of two consonants.

Authors:  Véronique Rey; Sonia De Martino; Robert Espesser; Michel Habib
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Nina Kraus; Erin Hayes
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems.

Authors:  Brad Wible; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem.

Authors:  Nicole M Russo; Trent G Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Erin A Hayes; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Reduced medial olivocochlear bundle system function in children with auditory processing disorders.

Authors:  Chava Muchnik; Daphne Ari-Even Roth; Rima Othman-Jebara; Hanna Putter-Katz; Esther L Shabtai; Minka Hildesheimer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.854

View more
  80 in total

1.  Cross-phaseogram: objective neural index of speech sound differentiation.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  Central auditory disorders: toward a neuropsychology of auditory objects.

Authors:  Johanna C Goll; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.710

4.  Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual speech fills in both discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Rachel P McAlpine; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2017-07-20

6.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

7.  Stable auditory processing underlies phonological awareness in typically developing preschoolers.

Authors:  Silvia Bonacina; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Jennifer Krizman; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Emotion and the auditory brainstem response to speech.

Authors:  Jade Q Wang; Trent Nicol; Erika Skoe; Mikko Sams; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 9.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.