High-resolution structure of the Escherichia coli ribosome.

Protein synthesis by the ribosome is highly dependent on the ionic conditions in the cellular environment, but the roles of ribosome solvation have remained poorly understood. Moreover, the functions of modifications to ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins have also been unclear. Here we present the structure of the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome at 2.4-Å resolution. The structure reveals details of the ribosomal subunit interface that are conserved in all domains of life, and it suggests how solvation contributes to ribosome integrity and function as well as how the conformation of ribosomal protein uS12 aids in mRNA decoding. This structure helps to explain the phylogenetic conservation of key elements of the ribosome, including post-transcriptional and post-translational modifications, and should serve as a basis for future antibiotic development.

Introduction

The structure and function of the ribosome in protein synthesis is exquisitely sensitive to ionic conditions[1]. Bacterial ribosomes carry a formal charge of nearly −4,000, as ribosomal proteins neutralize very little of the charge in the phosphodiester backbone in ribosomal RNA (rRNA). In the bacterium Escherichia coli, ribosomes harbor large numbers of different cations, including potassium, magnesium, and polyamines. These ions influence ribosome dynamics, including intersubunit rotation[2] as well as the mechanisms of mRNA decoding[3] and translocation[4,5]. Furthermore, the ribosome is highly hydrated, due to the relatively open nature of RNA secondary and tertiary structure[6].

In addition to high levels of solvation and counterion binding, both rRNA and ribosomal proteins undergo numerous posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications, respectively. The degree of these modifications increases with the complexity of the organism, suggesting that they have important functional roles[7]. The most common posttranscriptional modification is isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine, which bears a free imino group that can stabilize RNA structure through base-stacking interactions and the use of its N1 imino group as a hydrogen bond donor[8]. Further modifications of the E. coli ribosome include methylation of the ribose 2′-hydroxyl group, methylation of nucleobases and reduction of the nucleobase uridine to dihydrouridine[8]. Modification of RNA nucleotides leads to altered electronic and steric effects that result in altered base pairing potentials, preferred sugar puckers, and different base stacking properties[9].

Notably, posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications cluster in or near key functional sites of the ribosome, such as the decoding center, the peptidyl transferase center (PTC), the exit tunnel, and intersubunit bridges. However, the functional role of individual modifications remains poorly understood. Although some modifications are nearly universal in bacteria[10] the inhibition of specific rRNA modifications often has little effect on cell growth, hence, the function of each individual rRNA modification is not clear[11-13]. Notably, ribosomes lacking all pseudouridines cause severe growth defects in yeast[14]. Furthermore, even if individual rRNA modifications are dispensable, their presence leads to a competitive advantage for growth[15,16]. In addition, some ribosomal modifications are incorporated as an environmental response, and can have widespread impacts on the translation capacity of the ribosome[17-19].

To date, it has not been possible to accurately model solvation characteristics of the intact ribosome due to the generally low resolution of ribosome X-ray crystal structures[20], most at a resolution lower than ~2.8 Å. Recent high-resolution structures of the Thermus thermophiluss 70S ribosome used crystallographic data to 2.55 Å[21] and 2.4 Å[22] resolution, but the resulting structural models do not yet include solvation beyond inclusion of inner-sphere and outer-sphere coordinated Mg2+ ions, and do not include posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications. We therefore set out to solve the structure of the bacterial ribosome in order to elucidate its solvation characteristics and the structural impacts of ribosomal modifications. Here, we present a high-resolution structure of the E. coli ribosome, which enabled us to greatly improve the model of the bacterial ribosome by removing many previous modeling errors. The structure reveals unprecedented views of solvation as well as posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications of the ribosome in key functional sites and antibiotic binding sites. Comparisons to biochemical, genetic and phylogenetic data allows us to propose functional roles for a number of the structural features seen for the first time at high resolution.

Results

We significantly improved the diffraction power of E. coli 70S ribosome crystals[23] by extensively optimizing the cryo-stabilization procedure prior to crystal freezing, as well as detector geometry and crystal orientation to reduce diffraction overlap (Online Methods). Due to radiation damage caused by the X-ray beam, we merged diffraction data from more than one hundred high-quality crystals for the structure presented here. The 70S ribosome crystallized with two 70S ribosomes in the crystallographic asymmetric unit (Table 1), with the small (30S) subunit of ribosome I rotated to an intermediate position relative to the large (50S) subunit and with ribosome II in an unrotated state[23]. The electron density maps for most parts of ribosome I were of high quality, except for peripheral elements including protein L9, the dynamic L1 arm, the stalk proteins L10, L11 and L7–L12, sections of the GTPase center and A-site finger in the large (50S) subunit, and regions of the head domain of the small (30S) subunit (Fig. 1a). Ribosome II was more dynamic in this crystal form, resulting in electron density maps of lower quality in most regions (Supplementary Fig. 1a).

Table 1

Data collection and refinement statistics

	Merged data
Data collection
Space group	P212121
Cell dimensions
a, b, c (Å)	212.1, 433.9, 624.3
α, β, γ (°)	90.0, 90.0, 90.0
Resolution (Å)	69.39 – 2.11 (2.17 – 2.11)*
Rmerge	16.9 (205.2)
I/σI	5.1 (0.28)
CC(1/2) (%)	99.6 (13.7)*
Completeness (%)	93.2 (80.9)
Redundancy	4.15 (2.09)
Refinement
Resolution (Å)	69.39 – 2.1
No. reflections	3,003,826
Rwork/Rfree	21.85/23.38
No. atoms (without H)	295,744
Protein/RNA	286,907
Ligand/ion	1,083
Water	7,754
B-factors (Å2)
Protein/RNA, ribosome I	69.89
Protein/RNA, ribosome II	122.98
Ligand/ion	64.13
Water	53.25
r.m.s. deviations
Bond lengths (Å)	0.008
Bond angles (°)	1.270

Values in parentheses are for highest-resolution shell. 109 crystals were used to measure the data.

Figure 1

E. coli 70S ribosome I in an intermediate rotated state. (a) Ribosomal subunits of ribosome I colored by atomic displacement factor (ADP) from 20 to 150 Å2. The views are from the perspective of the subunit interface. Features in the 50S subunit include the central protuberance (CP), L1 arm (L1), protein L9 (L9), L7–L12 region (L12), A-site finger (ASF) and the GTPase center (G). In the 30S subunit, these include the head (H), body (B), and platform (PL). (b) Single-molecule imaging of the modulation of ribosome dynamics by magnesium ions. Occupancy of unrotated (red) and rotated (black) states of the ribosome as measured by smFRET between fluorophores on uS13 and uL1, shown with standard deviations of three technical replicates (Online methods).

Ribosome modeling in high-resolution electron density maps

We determined the 70S ribosome crystal structures at a resolution of approximately 2.4 – 2.5 Å (I/_I=1). Using the recently introduced cross-correlation parameter[24] CC1/2, the scaled and merged X-ray diffraction data measured from the above ribosome crystals extended to 2.11 Å, where the value of CC1/2 was still significant (13.7%, Supplementary Table 1), and were therefore included in the structure refinement. Due to the inherent dynamics of the ribosome and regions of disorder, the quality of the model varied by region, as reflected by the range of atomic displacement parameters (ADPs) (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1a). In the following description, we therefore focused our modeling and interpretation primarily on the regions that are well-ordered in ribosome I (Online Methods).

Consistent with the CC1/2 resolution, the electron density maps were highly detailed in many regions of the ribosome (Online Methods) (Supplementary Fig. 2). The directionality of non-bridging phosphate oxygen atoms in the rRNA was resolved and ribose 2′-hydroxyl groups were clearly visible, as were nucleotide exocyclic amines and carbonyl groups (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 3). In well-ordered ribosomal proteins, the peptide backbone and methyl groups of valine, leucine and isoleucine side chains, as well as guanidino groups of arginines were clearly resolved (Supplementary Fig. 3). This level of resolution allowed us to greatly improve the ribosomal protein models compared to a prior 2.8 Å E. coli ribosome X-ray structure as judged by MolProbity[25] (Supplementary Table 2–Supplementary Table 5). The data also allowed placement of more than 8,800 solvent molecules and ions. At this resolution, magnesium ions were readily distinguished from water and ammonium ions, and we could see specific polyamines. However, water and ammonium ions were difficult to tell apart, and were therefore modeled as waters throughout the structure.

The quality of the electron density in many regions revealed the contribution of solvent molecules to key functional sites of the ribosome, including the subunit interface, the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) and the exit tunnel. Furthermore, the electron density allowed modeling of many posttranslational and posttranscriptional modifications, including those in three ribosomal proteins[26,27] and 35 of 36 posttranscriptional modifications except for the substoichiometric s2C2501 modification in 23S rRNA[8,28] (Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 6). We also determined the absolute configuration of the posttranslational modification of β-methylthioaspartate at position 89 of protein uS12 in the small ribosomal subunit, the orientation of six out of seven nucleobase methylations in m2G and m6A (Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 7) and of the four 2′-hydroxymethylations.

Solvation of the ribosome at the subunit interface

Single-molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (smFRET) experiments demonstrated that lower Mg2+ concentrations promote rotated ribosome configurations in which tRNAs adopt hybrid site binding (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. 1b). In line with the smFRET data, lower Mg2+ concentrations favored crystallization of one ribosome in the crystallographic asymmetric unit in an intermediate rotated state[23] (ribosome I, Fig. 1a). Putrescine and spermidine were included in the crystallization and cryoprotection solutions due to their essential role in cellular physiology and the fidelity of translation[1,29]. These cellular polyamines are also required for 70S complex stability in smFRET experiments[30,31], although their contribution to ribosome dynamics are less clear.

In the new high-resolution structure of the ribosome, many of the RNA-rich intersubunit bridges in ribosome I showed clear evidence for water-mediated interactions between the two subunits, but there were few if any examples of clear magnesium ions or polyamines at the subunit interface (Supplementary Table 8). We observed electron density consistent with bound polyamines in the large subunit near the subunit interface in bridge B3 and near the base of helix H69 in 23S rRNA (Supplementary Fig. 3), but few other polyamines were clearly visible in the electron density. These results suggested that charge neutralization occurs primarily through diffusely bound ions[32], or possibly through ions bound in the RNA major groove[33], which may help to promote ribosome subunit association while also allowing for intersubunit rotation.

Bridge B3, considered the “pivot point” of intersubunit rotation[23,34], involves a type I A-minor motif interaction involving the minor-groove faces of two adenines in tandem sheared GA base pairs in 16S rRNA helix h44 of the 30S subunit that contact the minor-groove of two G-C base pairs in 23S rRNA helix H71 of the 50S subunit[33,35]. We identified three water molecules that buttress this A-minor motif, increasing the number of base pairing planes that interact between the small and the large subunit in bridge B3 from three to four (Fig. 2a–c).

Figure 2

Solvation at the ribosomal subunit interface and in the nascent peptide exit tunnel. (a–c) Water molecules that bridge the 16S (blue) and 23S (grey) rRNA in bridge B3 of ribosome I. 2′-hydroxyls involved in the water interactions are marked with asterisks. The location of bridge B3 is indicated in the inset. The feature enhanced maps are contoured at 2.5 standard deviations from the mean. (d) Solvation at the entrance of the nascent peptide exit tunnel. Labeled residues of 23S rRNA are shown in orange. The feature enhanced map is contoured at 2.0 standard deviations from the mean.

Whereas bridge B3 likely adopts a fairly constant conformation during intersubunit rotation, the remaining bridges change position[23,34,36]. Although we observed ordered solvent molecules in other bridges (Supplementary Table 8), bridge B6 is nearly devoid of ordered solvent, although the space between the two RNA helices that make up the bridge leaves room for several water molecules[33]. This is true in both copies of the 70S ribosome in the crystallographic asymmetric unit, in which bridge B6 is well ordered in terms of the RNA, and for which we could model solvent in the vicinity of the bridge.

Solvation of antibiotic binding sites in the exit tunnel

Macrolides, ketolides and streptogramin B are clinically important antibiotic classes that partially block the nascent peptide exit tunnel, leading to bacterial cell death[37,38]. In the exit tunnel, nucleotide A2058 of 23S rRNA is critical for antibiotic binding, and antibiotic resistance results from mutation or methylation of this nucleotide[39]. In the high-resolution ribosome structure, a number of solvent molecules in the proximity of A2058 overlap with the binding site of macrolides, ketolides and streptogramin B antibiotics (Fig. 2d, Supplementary Fig. 5a). These solvent molecules (here interpreted as water) form a layer between nucleotides A2058 and ψ746, and extend towards the base pair formed by A752 and U609, which stacks on the alkyl-aryl arm of the ketolide telithromycin[40,41] (Fig. 2d). These solvent molecules would have to be displaced upon antibiotic binding, the effects of which can be included in future computational docking methods.

The narrow “constriction site” of the nascent peptide exit tunnel is only about 10 Å wide and is confined by residues of ribosomal proteins uL4, uL22 and A751 of 23S rRNA[42,43]. Notably, clear electron density for 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol (MPD), a moderately hydrophobic molecule used in the crystallization solution, stacks on A751 and partly blocks the exit tunnel (Supplementary Fig. 5b). Cryo-electron microscopy studies[44] and molecular dynamics simulations[45] of the SecM stalled ribosome had identified that stacking of the hydrophobic side chain of amino acid Trp155 of SecM on nucleotide A751 is crucial for stalling (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Mutations of either the SecM nascent chain or A751 abolish stalling, indicating that this hydrophobic interaction is involved in regulation of gene expression of the protein translocase SecA, and may possibly contribute to the regulation of other nascent chains[46-48].

Ribosomal modifications near the PTC

A number of posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications are clustered near the peptidyl transferase center (Fig. 3a). In the classical state, nucleotides C74 and C75 in the 3′ CCA acceptor arm of the P-site tRNA base pair with G2252 and Gm2251 of the P loop of 23S rRNA, respectively, which help orient the peptidyl-tRNA for the peptidyl transfer reaction[21,49]. In the E. coli ribosome structure, Gm2251 assumes a C3′-endo sugar pucker, which may be stabilized by the 2′-O-methylation, since a C2′-endo pucker could lead to altered positioning of the nucleobase[50]. Notably, the remaining nucleotides of the E. coli ribosome carrying 2′-O-methylations (Supplementary Table 6) also adopt a C3′-endo pucker. The non-bridging phosphate oxygen of Gm2251 contacts the guanidinium group of Arg81 of uL16, which itself is modified with a hydroxyl group at the β-carbon (Fig. 3a,b). In the present structure, the hydroxyarginine 81 is present in two alternate conformations and its absolute configuration at the β-carbon is R, consistent with the hydroxylation catalyzed by ribosomal oxygenase ycfD[27]. On the opposite side of Arg81, Gm2251 is positioned next to the only dihydroudirine in the E. coli ribosome, D2449. A dihydrouridine nucleotide disrupts base stacking interactions due to the non-planar nature of the dihydrouridine nucleobase, and can stabilize its ribose and that of the 5′ neighboring nucleotide in C2′-endo puckers[51], as observed in the E. coli ribosome structure (Fig. 3c). In close proximity to the dihydrouridine, the methyl group on the exocyclic amine of m2G2445 adopts an s-trans position and occupies a cavity created by neighboring nucleobases including D2449 (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Table 7).

Figure 3

Posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications in functional centers of the ribosome. (a) View of the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) with C75 of the P-site tRNA (orange) modeled from PDB ID 3I8H and 3I8I[60]. Hydroxyarginine 81 (magenta) is in protein uL16 and Gm2251, dihydrouridine 2449 and m2G2445 are in 23S rRNA (grey). (b) Hydroxylation of arginine 81 of uL16 at the Cβ position is in the R configuration. The feature enhanced map is contoured at 2.5 standard deviations from the mean. (c) Dihydrouridine 2449 and A2448 assume a C2′-endo sugar pucker. Feature-enhanced electron density map shown as in (b). (d) Geometry of protein uS12 (cyan) near the mRNA decoding center. Proline 45 of uS12 in the cis-peptide conformation would be positioned less than 4 Å away from the 3rd nucleotide in the mRNA A-site codon (green). mRNA is modeled from PDB ID 4QCQ[22]. (e) Pro45 in uS12 with a cis-peptide bond and β-methylthioaspartate in the R configuration at position 89 shown with feature enhanced maps contoured at 2.5 and 2.2 standard deviations from the mean, respectively. (f) Model of mRNA (PDB ID: 4QCQ)[22] superimposed on the E. coli high-resolution structure, in which protein uS12 in the decoding site is modeled with a trans-3-hydroxy-proline at position 45. The 3-hydroxy group of Pro45 would be in hydrogen bonding distance of the O3′ of the 3rd position of the A-site codon.

Conformation of uS12 near the mRNA decoding center

Protein uS12 forms key parts of the mRNA decoding center of the small ribosomal subunit, with proline 45 of uS12 positioned less than 4 Å away from the third nucleotide of the mRNA A-site codon[21,22] (Fig. 3d,e). Interestingly, Pro45 clearly adopted a cis-peptide conformation in the present high-resolution structure (Fig. 3d,e), a conformation that persists through mRNA decoding[22], even though cis-prolines occur at a low frequency in proteins[52]. This stable conformation could have functional implications in mRNA decoding and mRNA and tRNA translocation. For example, in the eukaryotic homolog of uS12, rpS23, the corresponding proline residue (Pro62 in human, Pro64 in yeast), is mono- or dihydroxylated, respectively, depending on environmental or stress conditions[17-19]. Interestingly, the hydroxylation state of uS12’s Pro64 in yeast has been shown to affect stop-codon readthrough in a sequence- and context dependent manner[18]. Hydroxylation or dihydroxylation of this proline would change its interaction from a van der Waals contact to the mRNA to one mediated by a hydrogen bond with the O3′ of the third position of the A-site codon (Fig. 3f)[22], which may increase the binding energy of the ribosome-mRNA complex by about 1–2 kcal/mol, corresponding to the energy of a hydrogen bond.

In E. coli uS12, aspartate 89 is posttranslationally modified to β-methylthioaspartate[26], with an absolute configuration of 3R in the present structure (Fig. 3d–e). In this configuration, the side chain carboxylate is in hydrogen bonding distance with the guanidinium group of Arg50 of uS12, neutralizing its charge, and the methylthio group points towards the positively charged m7G527. The β-methylthio modification on Asp89, specific to bacteria, is introduced by RimO and YcaO[53]. Although mutations of Asp89 are lethal, E. coli strains with a rimO knockout have only a slightly slower cell growth phenotype[54]. However, in light of the role of Pro64 hydroxylations in eukaryotes (Pro45 in E. coli), the β-methylthio modification of Asp89 in bacteria may serve important functions under stress or variable growth conditions.

Pseudouridines in the ribosome

Pseudouridine has been proposed to stabilize RNA structures by presenting an extra hydrogen bond donor in the major groove, relative to uridine[8]. For six of the seven well-ordered pseudouridines in the present high-resolution structure (Supplementary Table 9), we observed a water-mediated contact between the pseudouridine N1 imino group in the major groove and the rRNA phosphate backbone. This is consistent with the model that these pseudouridines stabilize the local ribosomal structure by locking the nucleobase in place with respect to the rRNA backbone. One example in the 50S subunit tRNA P-site involves a network of water-mediated interactions including G954 and ψ955 of 23S rRNA helix H39 (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4

Pseudouridines and syn-pyrimidines in the ribosome. (a) Pseudouridine with a major groove water molecule. Shown is the N1 imino group of ψ955 in 23S rRNA hydrogen bonding to a water molecule that in turn hydrogen bonds to the non-bridging phosphate oxygen of ψ955 and G954. The feature enhanced map is contoured at 2.5 standard deviations from the mean. (b–d) Examples of syn-pyrimidines in the ribosome. Nucleotide U960 in a syn conformation stabilizes a triloop capping helix h31 in 16S rRNA by forming a reverse U-U base pair with U956. (c) The feature enhanced map for the U960–U956 base pair is contoured at 2.5 standard deviations from the mean. (d) Nucleotide U1779 in 23S rRNA adopts a syn conformation to form an unusual reverse Hoogsteen A–U base pair with A1784, allowing the N6 exocyclic amino group of A1784 to hydrogen bond with a non-bridging phosphate oxygen of U1779. The feature-enhanced electron density map is contoured at 2.5 standard deviations from the mean. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by red dashed lines. The hydrogen bond marked with an asterisk is 3.3 Å long.

Syn pyrimidines in the ribosome

Although the favorable conformation of the nucleobase is anti with respect to the ribose, purines can assume sterically less favorable syn conformations. We observed 120 examples of syn purines with good electron density in the E. coli ribosome (defined with a Chi angle in the range of −90° to +90°; Supplementary Table 10). However, syn pyrimidines are rare, due to a larger energetic penalty resulting from the steric clash of the O2 of pyrimidines with the ribose compared to the N3 in purines. Syn nucleotides seem to occur more frequently in functional sites of RNA structures, where the energetic cost for adopting the syn conformation may be compensated for by its favorable effects on RNA structure and function[55]. In highly ordered regions of the E. coli ribosome structure, we observed 15 pyrimidines in the syn conformation (Supplementary Table 11 and Supplementary Fig. 6). Intriguingly, many of these are supported by phylogenetic analysis as being nearly universal in bacteria or across all domains of life (Supplementary Table 11). For example, U960 of 16S rRNA adopts a syn conformation to form a reverse U-U base pair with U956 that stabilizes a tight triloop located at the base of helix h31 (Fig. 4b,c), which plays an active role in movement of A-site tRNA into the P-site on the small ribosomal subunit during translocation[56]. In the 50S subunit, U1779 assumes a syn conformation to form an unusual reverse Hoogsteen AU type base pair with A1784 in the loop capping helix H65 of 23S rRNA that forms part of the peptide exit tunnel in close proximity to nucleotides U1781–U1782, which line the binding pocket of several antibiotics (Fig. 4d).

Discussion

The new high-resolution structure of the E. coli 70S ribosome presented here provides a foundation for unraveling key mechanisms shared by ribosomes in all domains of life. For example, the geometry of ribosomal protein uS12 near the mRNA decoding site suggests a model for how hydroxylation of Pro45 could influence the energetics of mRNA decoding and mRNA and tRNA translocation. Sites of syn-pyrimidines, rare in most RNA contexts, reveal conserved base-pair patterns that could contribute to ribosomal RNA tertiary folding and key ribosomal functions, such as tRNA translocation[56]. Structural knowledge of clustered rRNA and protein modifications near functional centers can now be used to test the mechanisms of fine-tuning translation that likely confer a selective advantage to microbes in their natural habitats.

The present E. coli ribosome structure can also be used for comparisons to other structures of the 50S subunit and 70S ribosome. For example, the 2.2–2.4 Å structures of the archaeal H. marismortui 50S subunit[42,57,58], which serve as a model for the bacterial A2058G mutation that confers antibiotic resistance, reveal that the A2058G mutation would substantially alter the architecture and solvation of the macrolide, ketolide, and streptogramin B binding sites. Additionally, Um2552 in the A loop of the PTC adopts the same conformation in the E. coli 70S ribosome and H. marismortui 50S subunit, with its 2′-O-methyl group wedged between the nucleobases of U2554 and G2553, which pairs with C75 in A-site tRNA[21]. This positioning suggests that this modification could have functional importance in modulating the base pairing between 23S rRNA and A-site tRNA. It will be interesting in the future to compare the present structure to the recent 2.4 – 2.55 Å crystal structures of the Thermus thermophilus 70S ribosome[21,22], which are likely at sufficient resolution to allow modeling of posttranscriptional and posttranslational modifications and solvation.

Finally, the new high-resolution structure of the E. coli 70S ribosome can be used as a resource and reference for comparisons to other RNA structures, future ribosome structures in other conformational states, analyses of ribosome phylogenetics, and biochemical studies. For example, it should now be possible to probe the functional roles of pseudouridines and conserved syn-pyrimidines more directly. It is striking that, although some ordered solvent molecules could be identified in key locations at the subunit interface, i.e. in universally conserved bridge B3, most of the solvation at the subunit interface is seemingly diffuse in nature[32,59], which could be important for ribosome dynamics. Future studies of the ribosome by smFRET experiments and molecular dynamics simulations should be helpful in deciphering the roles of ordered and diffuse water and ions in the structure and dynamics of the ribosome.

Online Methods

Preparation of ribosome initiation complexes for smFRET experiments

Initiation complexes for the smFRET intersubunit rotation assay were formed using E. coli Cy3-S13 (N-Sfp) 30S and Cy5-L1 (T202C) 50S subunits and initiated with unlabeled fMet-tRNAfMet, as previously described[61]. Initiation complexes for the tRNA hybrid state fluctuations assay were formed using unlabeled E. coli subunits and initiated with fMet-tRNAfMet (Cy3-s4U8), as previously described[30,62].

Single-molecule intersubunit rotation and tRNA hybrid state assays

smFRET experiments were performed using a prism-based total internal reflection (TIR) microscope[30,62] at 25 °C in Tris-polymix buffer[61] with an oxygen scavenging system[63], triplet-state quenching compounds[64] (1 mM cyclooctatetraene, 1 mM nitrobenzyl alcohol, 1 mM Trolox) and 2.5 to 30 mM Mg2+. After surface immobilization of initiation complexes programmed with biotinylated mRNA to PEG-passivated, streptavidin-coated quartz microfluidic chambers[30,62], pre-translocation complexes were prepared by incubating with either unlabeled ternary complex of EF-Tu(GTP)Phe-tRNAPhe (for the intersubunit rotation assay) or EF-Tu(GTP)Phe-tRNAPhe(Cy5-acp3U47) (for the tRNA hybrid state assay) for 2 min in Tris-polymix buffer, as previously described[4]. Cy3 fluorophores on either uS13 or P-site tRNA were illuminated with a 532 nm diode-pumped solid-state laser (Opus, LaserQuantum). Fluorescence emission from Cy3 and Cy5 fluorophores was collected using a 1.27 N.A. PlanApo water immersion objective (Nikon) and spectrally separated using a DualCam device (Photometrics) using a 640dcxr dichroic mirror (Chroma). smFRET data were acquired at 25 ms integration time and analyzed using analytical software implemented in MATLAB (MathWorks). FRET trajectories were idealized using the segmental k-means algorithm[65], as previously described[4,61]. Experiments were performed using three technical replicates, i.e. with frozen aliquots of the same ribosome complex preparations used on three separate days.

Ribosome Crystallization and Cryo-protection

Ribosomes purified from E. coli strain MRE600[33] were crystallized as described previously[23]. A highly optimized seven-step cryo-stabilization procedure was established to prepare ribosome crystals for cryo-cooling. This procedure ensured robust crystal-to-crystal reproducibility, allowing diffraction data to be measured and merged from multiple crystals. Crystals were soaked in crystallization buffer containing 6–7% PEG 8,000, 7% MPD, 0–24% PEG 400, 3.75–4.5 mM MgCl2, 5–5.75 mM putrescine, 4.35–5 mM spermidine, pH 4.8–5.7. More specifically the concentrations of the variable parameters for the individual cryostabilizers were as follows. Stabilizer #1: 7% PEG 8,000, 7% MPD, 3.75 mM MgCl2, 5 mM putrescine, 4.35 mM spermidine, 380 mM NH4Cl, 0% PEG 400, pH 5.7; stabilizer #2 to #6: 7% PEG 8,000, 7% MPD, 3.75 mM MgCl2, 5.75 mM putrescine, 5 mM spermidine, 380 mM NH4Cl, PEG 400 6% (#2), 9% (#3), 12% (#4), 15% (#5), 18% (#6), pH 4.8; stabilizer #7: 6% PEG 8,000, 7% MPD, 4.5 mM MgCl2, 5.75 mM putrescine, 5 mM spermidine, 380 mM NH4Cl,, 24% PEG 400, pH 5.0. Crystals were soaked in stabilizer #1 for 100 min., then soaked in each of stabilizers #2 through #6 for 5–10 min., and stored overnight in stabilizer #7.

X-ray diffraction data measurement

Diffraction data were measured from crystals cooled to 100 K using 0.1° oscillations at beamline 8.3.1 at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), which is equipped with an ADSC Q315r detector. In order to reduce diffraction spot overlap due to the large unit cell size of the ribosome crystals, crystals were adjusted to a position in which the c* axis ran across the detector at a ~45° angle to the horizontal plane, when c* was oriented parallel to the detector, i.e. normal to the x-ray beam. Furthermore, the crystal-to-detector distance was increased to 650 mm and the slit width was reduced to ~0.35 mradians during x-ray diffraction data collection. With these settings and exposure times of 3 minutes, diffraction spots to at least 2.1 Å could be observed. These were captured by a face-normal offset of the detector by about 17.5°. Diffraction data frames usually spanning only a total of 0.6° were indexed, integrated, and scaled using XDS from the XDS Program Package[66]. Over 470 data sets collected from 109 crystals were used.

Structure modeling and refinement

Structure factor phases were obtained by molecular replacement using the phenix.refine component of PHENIX[67] and the following PDB entries as model input with mRNA, tRNAs, and ribosome recycling factor removed: 3R8S, 3R8T, 4GD1, and 4GD2. The resulting model was manually improved using Coot[68] followed by multiple rounds of positional, atomic displacement parameter (ADP), and TLS refinement using the phenix.refine component of PHENIX. In order to improve the model of the second ribosome in the asymmetric unit, coordinate information of the first ribosome were used as a reference model during refinement.

For initial model building, electron density maps were calculated using structure factors from PHENIX refinements sharpened by applying a negative B-factor of −50 Å2, and with the figure of merit was dampened by applying a positive B-factor of 50 Å2. The resulting structure factors and figures of merit were subjected to density modification in DM[69], using a resolution range of 30 – 2.1 Å and Sayre’s equation[70,71]. Finally, the DM-modified structure factors and figures of merit were used to calculate sharpened (2FObs–FCalc) and (FObs–FCalc) electron density maps. Homology models for various parts of the ribosome were used to guide manual rebuilding[72-77] (including PDB 3A1P). Subsequent refinement and model building used feature-enhanced maps generated by phenix.fem in the PHENIX-1.9–1692 release, with default parameters plus the combined-omit map algorithm[78]. All maps presented in the figures use feature enhanced maps.

Molprobity[25] analyses were carried out as follows. Prior to running the MolProbity web server, nucleotides 77–93, 841–847, 999–1012, and 1016–1042 were removed from 16S rRNA in the 30S subunit due to disorder. From the 50S subunit, E. coli ribosomal proteins L1, L9, L10, L11, and nucleotides 883–897, 1057–1090 and 2099–2188 of 23S rRNA were removed due to their high degree of disorder. High-resolution ribosome II in the present structure and PDB ID: 4U26 for the 2.8 Å structure[79] were used for the analysis.

Phylogenetic comparisons of nucleotides in the ribosome were carried out using “The Comparative RNA Web Site and Project”[80].