Literature DB >> 25734490

The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT.

J M Park1, H-G Wu, J H Kim, J N K Carlson, K Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine a new metric utilizing multileaf collimator (MLC) speeds and accelerations to predict plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
METHODS: To verify VMAT delivery accuracy, gamma evaluations, analysis of mechanical parameter difference between plans and log files, and analysis of changes in dose-volumetric parameters between plans and plans reconstructed with log files were performed with 40 VMAT plans. The average proportion of leaf speeds ranging from l to h cm s(-1) (Sl-h and l-h = 0-0.4, 0.4-0.8, 0.8-1.2, 1.2-1.6 and 1.6-2.0), mean and standard deviation of MLC speeds were calculated for each VMAT plan. The same was carried out for accelerations in centimetre per second squared (Al-h and l-h = 0-4, 4-8, 8-12, 12-16 and 16-20). The correlations of those indicators to plan delivery accuracy were analysed with Spearman's correlation coefficient (rs).
RESULTS: The S1.2-1.6 and mean acceleration of MLCs showed generally higher correlations to plan delivery accuracy than did others. The highest rs values were observed between S1.2-1.6 and global 1%/2 mm (rs = -0.698 with p < 0.001) as well as mean acceleration and global 1%/2 mm (rs = -0.650 with p < 0.001). As the proportion of MLC speeds and accelerations >0.4 and 4 cm s(-2) increased, the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT decreased.
CONCLUSION: The variations in MLC speeds and accelerations showed considerable correlations to VMAT delivery accuracy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: As the MLC speeds and accelerations increased, VMAT delivery accuracy reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25734490      PMCID: PMC4628477          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  32 in total

1.  Use of a quantitative index of beam modulation to characterize dose conformality: illustration by a comparison of full beamlet IMRT, few-segment IMRT (fsIMRT) and conformal unmodulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  On the role of the optimization algorithm of RapidArc(®) volumetric modulated arc therapy on plan quality and efficiency.

Authors:  Eugenio Vanetti; Giorgia Nicolini; Janne Nord; Jarkko Peltola; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quality assurance of dynamic parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  A Manikandan; B Sarkar; R Holla; T R Vivek; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files.

Authors:  Tony Teke; Alanah M Bergman; William Kwa; Bradford Gill; Cheryl Duzenli; I Antoniu Popescu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  On the sensitivity of common gamma-index evaluation methods to MLC misalignments in Rapidarc quality assurance.

Authors:  G Heilemann; B Poppe; W Laub
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  An adaptive planning strategy for station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT): Segmentally boosted VMAT.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.

Authors:  C E Agnew; R B King; A R Hounsell; C K McGarry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Patient-specific quality assurance method for VMAT treatment delivery.

Authors:  Eduard Schreibmann; Anees Dhabaan; Eric Elder; Tim Fox
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Dosimetric evaluation of Tomotherapy and four-box field conformal radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mina Yu; Hong Seok Jang; Dong Min Jeon; Geum Seong Cheon; Hyo Chun Lee; Mi Joo Chung; Sung Hwan Kim; Jong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2013-12-31
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Authors:  Sophie Chiavassa; Igor Bessieres; Magali Edouard; Michel Mathot; Alexandra Moignier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Optical and x-ray technology synergies enabling diagnostic and therapeutic applications in medicine.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  The role of complexity metrics in a multi-institutional dosimetry audit of VMAT.

Authors:  Conor K McGarry; Christina E Agnew; Mohammad Hussein; Yatman Tsang; Alan McWilliam; Alan R Hounsell; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Predicting gamma evaluation results of patient-specific head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy quality assurance based on multileaf collimator patterns and fluence map features: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Sangutid Thongsawad; Somyot Srisatit; Todsaporn Fuangrod
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.243

5.  Time motion study to evaluate the impact of flattening filter free beam on overall treatment time for frameless intracranial radiosurgery using Varian TrueBeam® linear accelerator.

Authors:  Gopinath Mamballikalam; S Senthilkumar; C O Clinto; P M Ahamed Basith; R C Jaon Bos; Tems Thomas
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  Fully automated searching for the optimal VMAT jaw settings based on Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) and RapidPlan knowledge-based planning.

Authors:  Yuliang Huang; Haizhen Yue; Meijiao Wang; Sha Li; Jian Zhang; Zhuolun Liu; Yibao Zhang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  The effect of extremely narrow MLC leaf width on the plan quality of VMAT for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; So-Yeon Park; Jin Ho Kim; Joel Carlson; Jung-In Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Correlation analysis between 2D and quasi-3D gamma evaluations for both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jung-In Kim; Chang Heon Choi; Hong-Gyun Wu; Jin Ho Kim; Kyubo Kim; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17

9.  Gamma analysis with a gamma criterion of 2%/1 mm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy technique: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Jung-In Kim; Minsoo Chun; Hong-Gyun Wu; Eui Kyu Chie; Hak Jae Kim; Jin Ho Kim; Jong Min Park
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-16

10.  Practical implications for the quality assurance of modulated radiation therapy techniques using point detector arrays.

Authors:  Steffi Kantz; Almut Troeller McDermott; Matthias Söhn; Sabine Reinhardt; Claus Belka; Katia Parodi; Michael Reiner
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.