Literature DB >> 31295002

Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Sophie Chiavassa1, Igor Bessieres2, Magali Edouard3, Michel Mathot4, Alexandra Moignier1.   

Abstract

Modulated radiotherapy with multileaf collimators is widely used to improve target conformity and normal tissue sparing. This introduced an additional degree of complexity, studied by multiple teams through different properties. Three categories of complexity metrics were considered in this review: fluence, deliverability and accuracy metrics. The first part of this review is dedicated to the inventory of these complexity metrics. Different applications of these metrics emerged. Influencing the optimizer by integrating complexity metrics into the cost function has been little explored and requires more investigations. In modern treatment planning system, it remains confined to MUs or treatment time limitation. A large majority of studies calculated metrics only for analysis, without plan modification. The main application was to streamline the patient specific quality assurance workload, investigating the capability of complexity metrics to predict patient specific quality assurance results. Additionally complexity metrics were used to analyze behaviour of TPS optimizer, compare TPS, operators and plan properties, and perform multicentre audit. Their potential was also explored in the context of adaptive radiotherapy and automation planning. The second part of the review gives an overview of these studies based on the complexity metrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31295002      PMCID: PMC6774599          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  75 in total

1.  Use of a quantitative index of beam modulation to characterize dose conformality: illustration by a comparison of full beamlet IMRT, few-segment IMRT (fsIMRT) and conformal unmodulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Webb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Spatial resolution of 2D ionization chamber arrays for IMRT dose verification: single-detector size and sampling step width.

Authors:  Björn Poppe; Armand Djouguela; Arne Blechschmidt; Kay Willborn; Antje Rühmann; Dietrich Harder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The tradeoff between treatment plan quality and required number of monitor units in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  David Craft; Philipp Süss; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability.

Authors:  Andrea L McNiven; Michael B Sharpe; Thomas G Purdie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; Jay W Burmeister; Nesrin Dogan; Thomas J LoSasso; James G Mechalakos; Dimitris Mihailidis; Andrea Molineu; Jatinder R Palta; Chester R Ramsey; Bill J Salter; Jie Shi; Ping Xia; Ning J Yue; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Examination of the properties of IMRT and VMAT beams and evaluation against pre-treatment quality assurance results.

Authors:  S B Crowe; T Kairn; N Middlebrook; B Sutherland; B Hill; J Kenny; C M Langton; J V Trapp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Multi-centre audit of VMAT planning and pre-treatment verification.

Authors:  Diego Jurado-Bruggeman; Victor Hernández; Jordi Sáez; David Navarro; Francisco Pino; Tatiana Martínez; Maria-Elena Alayrach; Norbert Ailleres; Alejandro Melero; Núria Jornet
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Photon optimizer (PO) vs progressive resolution optimizer (PRO): a conformality- and complexity-based comparison for intensity-modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Diana Binny; Tanya Kairn; Craig M Lancaster; Jamie V Trapp; Scott B Crowe
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.482

9.  Fully automated, multi-criterial planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - An international multi-center validation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ben Heijmen; Peter Voet; Dennie Fransen; Joan Penninkhof; Maaike Milder; Hafid Akhiat; Pierluigi Bonomo; Marta Casati; Dietmar Georg; Gregor Goldner; Ann Henry; John Lilley; Frank Lohr; Livia Marrazzo; Stefania Pallotta; Roberto Pellegrini; Yvette Seppenwoolde; Gabriele Simontacchi; Volker Steil; Florian Stieler; Stuart Wilson; Sebastiaan Breedveld
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Reliability of the gamma index analysis as a verification method of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Jong Min Park; Jung-In Kim; So-Yeon Park; Do Hoon Oh; Sang-Tae Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  17 in total

1.  Image-based data mining applies to data collected from children.

Authors:  Lydia J Wilson; Abigail Bryce-Atkinson; Andrew Green; Yimei Li; Thomas E Merchant; Marcel van Herk; Eliana Vasquez Osorio; Austin M Faught; Marianne C Aznar
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.119

2.  Effect of treatment planning system parameters on beam modulation complexity for treatment plans with single-layer multi-leaf collimator and dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator.

Authors:  Paulo Quintero; Yongqiang Cheng; David Benoit; Craig Moore; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Dose deviations induced by respiratory motion for radiotherapy of lung tumors: Impact of CT reconstruction, plan complexity, and fraction size.

Authors:  Erlend P S Sande; Ana M Acosta Roa; Taran P Hellebust
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Edge area metric complexity scoring of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.

Authors:  Julia Götstedt; Anna Bäck
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-06

5.  Comparison and Evaluation of Different Radiotherapy Techniques Using Biodosimetry Based on Cytogenetics.

Authors:  Aggeliki Nikolakopoulou; Vasiliki Peppa; Antigoni Alexiou; George Pissakas; Georgia Terzoudi; Pantelis Karaiskos
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife.

Authors:  Jun Li; Xile Zhang; Yuxi Pan; Hongqing Zhuang; Junjie Wang; Ruijie Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Survey of patient-specific quality assurance practice for IMRT and VMAT.

Authors:  Gordon H Chan; Lee C L Chin; Ady Abdellatif; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Lesley Buckley; Daria Comsa; Dal Granville; Jenna King; Patrick L Rapley; Aaron Vandermeer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Radiation treatment planning study to investigate feasibility of delivering Immunotherapy in Combination with Ablative Radiosurgery to Ultra-High DoSes (ICARUS).

Authors:  Michelle B Rokni; Kelli B Pointer; Jonathan George; Jason J Luke; Steven J Chmura; Gage Redler
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Automated treatment planning as a dose escalation strategy for stereotactic radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Anna Ianiro; Carmela Romano; Francesco Deodato; Gabriella Macchia; Pietro Viola; Milly Buwenge; Silvia Cammelli; Antonio Pierro; Vincenzo Valentini; Alessio G Morganti
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.243

10.  Quantified VMAT plan complexity in relation to measurement-based quality assurance results.

Authors:  Michael Nguyen; Gordon H Chan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.