Literature DB >> 12894969

Use of a quantitative index of beam modulation to characterize dose conformality: illustration by a comparison of full beamlet IMRT, few-segment IMRT (fsIMRT) and conformal unmodulated radiotherapy.

S Webb1.   

Abstract

A technique is presented for characterizing the degree of modulation in an intensity-modulated beam. It is shown that the modulation increases as dose conformality increases. Full intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is compared with a two-weight-per-field technique and with simple geometrically conformal beams. It is suggested that each individual planning problem requires some comparative planning of this type because there is no simple answer to the question of the degree to which IMRT improves dose conformality. This depends on the problem geometry, the dose prescription, the cost function, the number of beams and other planning conditions. A methodology is presented for such comparative planning studies and this is illustrated with the solution of two planning problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12894969     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/14/301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  Improving IMRT delivery efficiency with reweighted L1-minimization for inverse planning.

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Stephen Becker; Rena Lee; Soonhyouk Lee; Sukyoung Shin; Emmanuel Candès; Lei Xing; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Inverse planning for IMRT with nonuniform beam profiles using total-variation regularization (TVR).

Authors:  Taeho Kim; Lei Zhu; Tae-Suk Suh; Sarah Geneser; Bowen Meng; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT.

Authors:  J M Park; H-G Wu; J H Kim; J N K Carlson; K Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Complexity metrics for IMRT and VMAT plans: a review of current literature and applications.

Authors:  Sophie Chiavassa; Igor Bessieres; Magali Edouard; Michel Mathot; Alexandra Moignier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.

Authors:  Mallory C Glenn; Victor Hernandez; Jordi Saez; David S Followill; Rebecca M Howell; Julianne M Pollard-Larkin; Shouhao Zhou; Stephen F Kry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Dose optimization with first-order total-variation minimization for dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy (DASSIM-RT).

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Ruijiang Li; Rena Lee; Thomas Goldstein; Stephen Boyd; Emmanuel Candes; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Predicting gamma evaluation results of patient-specific head and neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy quality assurance based on multileaf collimator patterns and fluence map features: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Sangutid Thongsawad; Somyot Srisatit; Todsaporn Fuangrod
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.243

8.  Validation of in-house knowledge-based planning model for advance-stage lung cancer patients treated using VMAT radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nilesh S Tambe; Isabel M Pires; Craig Moore; Christopher Cawthorne; Andrew W Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Effect of treatment planning system parameters on beam modulation complexity for treatment plans with single-layer multi-leaf collimator and dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator.

Authors:  Paulo Quintero; Yongqiang Cheng; David Benoit; Craig Moore; Andrew Beavis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  What is an acceptably smoothed fluence? Dosimetric and delivery considerations for dynamic sliding window IMRT.

Authors:  Nicolini Giorgia; Fogliata Antonella; Vanetti Eugenio; Clivio Alessandro; Ammazzalorso Filippo; Cozzi Luca
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.