BACKGROUND: The aim was to study the impact of the flattening filter free (FFF) beam on overall treatment time for frameless intracranial radiosurgery using TrueBeam® LINAC.The development of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is possible due to the incorporation of image guidance in the delivery of treatment. It is important to analyze the cost and benefits of FFF beams for treating SRS by understanding the impact of FFF beams in reducing the treatment time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic conformal arc (DCA ) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated using 6 MV with a flattening filter (FF) and FFF beams. Overall treatment time was divided into beam on time (BOT) and beam off time (BFT). Percentage beam on time reduction (PBOTR) and Percentage total time reduction (PTTR) factors were defined for the comparison. RESULTS: BOT reduction was observed to be significant for higher dose per fraction but subjected to the treatment technique and modulation differences. PBOTR values are much higher than PTTR values. The 39.9% of PBOTR resulted in only 8% PTTR for DCA and 65.3% resulted in 15.9% PTTR for VMAT. CONCLUSION: Major BFT was utilized for imaging and verification. FFF beam significantly reduced the beam on time and was found to be most effective if the fractional dose was as high as that for SRS. Newly defined PBOTR and PTTR factors are very useful indicators to evaluate the efficacy of FFF beams in terms of time reduction.
BACKGROUND: The aim was to study the impact of the flattening filter free (FFF) beam on overall treatment time for frameless intracranial radiosurgery using TrueBeam® LINAC.The development of frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is possible due to the incorporation of image guidance in the delivery of treatment. It is important to analyze the cost and benefits of FFF beams for treating SRS by understanding the impact of FFF beams in reducing the treatment time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic conformal arc (DCA ) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) plans were generated using 6 MV with a flattening filter (FF) and FFF beams. Overall treatment time was divided into beam on time (BOT) and beam off time (BFT). Percentage beam on time reduction (PBOTR) and Percentage total time reduction (PTTR) factors were defined for the comparison. RESULTS: BOT reduction was observed to be significant for higher dose per fraction but subjected to the treatment technique and modulation differences. PBOTR values are much higher than PTTR values. The 39.9% of PBOTR resulted in only 8% PTTR for DCA and 65.3% resulted in 15.9% PTTR for VMAT. CONCLUSION: Major BFT was utilized for imaging and verification. FFF beam significantly reduced the beam on time and was found to be most effective if the fractional dose was as high as that for SRS. Newly defined PBOTR and PTTR factors are very useful indicators to evaluate the efficacy of FFF beams in terms of time reduction.
Authors: Brendan M Prendergast; John B Fiveash; Richard A Popple; Grant M Clark; Evan M Thomas; Douglas J Minnich; Rojymon Jacob; Sharon A Spencer; James A Bonner; Michael C Dobelbower Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Steven Babic; Young Lee; Mark Ruschin; Fiona Lochray; Alex Lightstone; Eshetu Atenafu; Nic Phan; Todd Mainprize; May Tsao; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 2.102