| Literature DB >> 25685910 |
Eli Chapman1, Nick Maksim2, Fabian de la Cruz3, James J La Clair4.
Abstract
It is remarkable that a pathway as ubiquitous as protein quality control can be targeted to treat cancer. Bortezomib, an inhibitor of the proteasome, was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more than 10 years ago to treat refractory myeloma and later extended to lymphoma. Its use has increased the survival rate of myeloma patients by as much as three years. This success was followed with the recent accelerated approval of the natural product derived proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib (Kyprolis®), which is used to treat patients with bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma. The success of these two drugs has validated protein quality control as a viable target to fight select cancers, but begs the question why are proteasome inhibitors limited to lymphoma and myeloma? More recently, these limitations have encouraged the search for additional targets within the protein quality control system that might offer heightened cancer cell specificity, enhanced clinical utility, a lower rate of resistance, reduced toxicity, and mitigated side effects. One promising target is p97, an ATPase associated with various cellular activities (AAA+) chaperone. p97 figures prominently in protein quality control as well as serving a variety of other cellular functions associated with cancer. More than a decade ago, it was determined that up-regulation of p97 in many forms of cancer correlates with a poor clinical outcome. Since these initial discoveries, a mechanistic explanation for this observation has been partially illuminated, but details are lacking. Understandably, given this clinical correlation, myriad roles within the cell, and its importance in protein quality control, p97 has emerged as a potential therapeutic target. This review provides an overview of efforts towards the discovery of small molecule inhibitors of p97, offering a synopsis of efforts that parallel the excellent reviews that currently exist on p97 structure, function, and physiology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25685910 PMCID: PMC4576884 DOI: 10.3390/molecules20023027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structure of the AAA+ chaperone p97. (a) The structure of the p97 hexamer rendered from PDB ID 3CF3 providing front, side, and top views denoting the positions of the N domain (red), the D1 domain (green), and the D2 domain (magenta) within one subunit; (b) Close up of a single subunit illustrating the N domain, D1 domain, and D2 domain along with the N-D1 and D1-D2 linker regions (blue); (c) The domain architecture of p97 by amino acid number colored as in a and b (top). A series of deletion and point mutations used by many research groups to dissect the mechanism of p97 inhibitors.
Figure 2p97 function. The central image is from the highest resolution crystal structure of p97. Two contiguous subunits have been colored by domain: N-domains (red), D1-domains (green), D2-domains (magenta), and the linkers connecting the domains are shown (blue). As demonstrated in the light blue boxes, p97 is involved in a large number of biological processes, which are facilitated by a cohort of cofactors as shown over the arrows.
Figure 3Structures of the current collection of p97 inhibitors. Compounds can be sorted by classes as given by unselective agents (green), selective agents (red), natural products (blue) and a kinase inhibitor that causes misregulation of p97 by blocking phosphorylation of the C-terminus (violet; not discussed in text) [90].
Compounds discussed in the present review.
| Compound | Mechanism | p97 IC50 (µM) | Selectivity | Cellular |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eeyarestatin I | Allosteric | 5–10 (Kd) | Does not stabilize ODD-Luc or Luc-ODC | UbG76VGFP IC50 3.7 µM |
| 2-anilino-4-aryl-1,3-thiazole-2-thiophene | ATP-sensitive | 0.11 | Not reported | Ub-Luc stabilization EC50 0.09 µM |
| Syk inhibitor III | Covalent; modifies D2 ATPase pocket | 1.7 | ODD-Luc IC50 5.9 µM | UbG76VGFP IC50 1.6 µM |
| Alkylsulfanyl-1,2-4-triazoles | Allosteric | 0.063 | IC50 0.38 (HCT116 cells) | |
| DBeQ | ATP-sensitive; binds D1 and D2 | 2.6 | ODD-Luc IC50 56 µM | UbG76VGFP IC50 2.3 µM |
| ML-240 | ATP-sensitive; D2 selective | 0.11 | ODD-Luc IC50 28 µM | UbG76VGFP IC50 0.9 µM |
| ML-241 | ATP-sensitive; D2 selective | 0.11 | ODD-Luc IC50 46 µM | UbG76VGFP IC50 3.5 µM |
| NMS-859 | Covalent; binds D2 ATP pocket | 0.37 | NSF, SPATA5, VPS4B, RuvBL1, HSP90, 50 kinases > 10 µM | Extensive cellular studies; toxicity and p97 specific pathways |
| NMS-873 | Allosteric; D1-D2 interface | 0.02 | NSF, SPATA5, VPS4B, RuvBL1, HSP90, 50 kinases > 10 µM | Extensive cellular studies; toxicity and p97 specific pathways |
| Xanthohumol | Binds to N-domains | Not reported | Not reported | Examined ERAD, UPR, and autophagy |
| Rheoemodin | ATP-sensitive; D1 selective | 39.8 | NSF, ClpX, GroEL > 200 µM; no protection of CD3δ | UbG76VGFP and TCRα stabilized, CD3δ not stabilized, poly-Ub increased, UPR activated, autophagy inhibited, apoptosis activated |
| 1–Hydroxydehydroherbarin | Allosteric; unknown binding site | 21.7 | NSF, GroEL > 200 µM; no protection of CD3δ | UbG76VGFP and TCRα stabilized, CD3δ not stabilized, poly-Ub increased, UPR activated, autophagy inhibited, apoptosis activated |
| Phomapyrrolidone A | Allosteric; unknown binding site | 6.6 | NSF, GroEL > 200 µM; no protection of CD3δ | UbG76VGFP and TCRα stabilized, CD3δ not stabilized, poly-Ub increased, UPR activated, autophagy inhibited, apoptosis activated |
| 2-(Cyclohexyl-methylamino)pyrimidine | ATP-sensitive; unknown binding site | 0.074 µM | NSF, SPATA5, VPS4B, RuvBL1, HSP90, 50 kinases > 10 µM | IC50 5.82 (HCT116); poly-Ub increased; UPR increased |