Literature DB >> 6600276

Image improvement and design optimization of the time-of-flight PET.

W H Wong, N A Mullani, E A Philippe, R Hartz, K L Gould.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) with the added time-of-flight information has been shown to provide a better reconstructed image over conventional positron tomography. This improvement depends on the size of the object being imaged, the intrinsic resolution of the detector, and the time-of-flight resolution. Moreover, the signal-to-noise ratio of a PET image is related not only to the total number of counts in the image but also the event-locating uncertainties, the reconstruction filter function, and the recovered resolution in the image. This study provides a physical explanation for, and description of, the improvement in signal-to-noise ratio of a reconstructed image as a function of the crucial design parameters: time-of-flight timing resolution, intrinsic detector resolution, object size, and reconstructed image resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6600276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  14 in total

1.  Recent Advances and Future Advances in Time-of-Flight PET.

Authors:  William W Moses
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 2.  Focus on time-of-flight PET: the benefits of improved time resolution.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  MAP reconstruction for Fourier rebinned TOF-PET data.

Authors:  Bing Bai; Yanguang Lin; Wentao Zhu; Ran Ren; Quanzheng Li; Magnus Dahlbom; Frank DiFilippo; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Instrumentation for Time-of-Flight Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Muhammad Nasir Ullah; Eva Pratiwi; Jimin Cheon; Hojong Choi; Jung Yeol Yeom
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Y L Yamamoto; C J Thompson; M Diksic; E Meyer; W H Feindel
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Effect of Scan Time on Oncologic Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET.

Authors:  Dan J Kadrmas; M Bugrahan Oktay; Michael E Casey; James J Hamill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.679

Review 7.  Clinical cardiac PET using generator-produced Rb-82: a review.

Authors:  K L Gould
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  The imaging performance of a LaBr3-based PET scanner.

Authors:  M E Daube-Witherspoon; S Surti; A Perkins; C C M Kyba; R Wiener; M E Werner; R Kulp; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Fisher information-based evaluation of image quality for time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Kathleen Vunckx; Lin Zhou; Samuel Matej; Michel Defrise; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  Advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.