Literature DB >> 24078744

Design Optimization of a TOF, Breast PET Scanner.

Eunsin Lee1, Matthew E Werner, Joel S Karp, Suleman Surti.   

Abstract

A dedicated breast positron emission tomography (PET) scanner with limited angle geometry can provide flexibility in detector placement around the patient as well as the ability to combine it with other imaging modalities. A primary challenge of a stationary limited angle scanner is the reduced image quality due to artifacts present in the reconstructed image leading to a loss in quantitative information. Previously it has been shown that using time-of-flight (TOF) information in image reconstruction can help reduce these image artifacts arising due to missing angular projections. Our goal in this work is to optimize the TOF, breast scanner design by performing studies for estimating image uniformity and lesion activity uptake as a function of system timing resolution, scanner angular coverage and shape. Our results show that (i) 1.5 × 1.5 × 15 mm3 lutetium oxy-orthosilicate (LSO) crystals provide a high spatial resolution and system sensitivity relative to clinical scanners, (ii) 2/3 angular coverage scanner design with TOF timing resolution less than 600 ps is appropriate for providing a tomographic image with fewer artifacts and good lesion uptake estimation relative to other partial ring designs studied in this work, (iii) a flat scanner design with 2/3 angular coverage is affected more by larger parallax error than a curved scanner geometry with the same angular coverage, but provides more uniform lesion contrast estimate over the imaging field-of-view (FOV), (iv) 2/3 angular coverage, flat, 300 ps TOF scanner design (for short, practical scan times of ≤ 5 mins per breast) provides similar precision of contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) values to a full curved, non-TOF scanner, and (v) employing depth-of-interaction (DOI) measuring detector and/or implementing resolution modeling (RM) in image reconstruction lead to improved and more uniform spatial resolution and lesion contrast over the whole FOV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast scanner; PET; time-of-flight

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078744      PMCID: PMC3783021          DOI: 10.1109/TNS.2013.2257849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci        ISSN: 0018-9499            Impact factor:   1.679


  8 in total

1.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Stan Majewski; Mark F Smith; James Proffitt; William Hammond; Amarnath Srinivasan; John McKisson; Vladimir Popov; Andrew Weisenberger; Clifford O Judy; Brian Kross; Srikanth Ramasubramanian; Larry E Banta; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle Champley
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Design and evaluation of the MAMMI dedicated breast PET.

Authors:  L Moliner; A J Gonzalez; A Soriano; F Sanchez; C Correcher; A Orero; M Carles; L F Vidal; J Barbera; L Caballero; M Seimetz; C Vazquez; J M Benlloch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Clinical performance of 2 dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging: initial evaluation.

Authors:  Mami Iima; Yuji Nakamoto; Shotaro Kanao; Tomoharu Sugie; Takayuki Ueno; Mayumi Kawada; Yoshiki Mikami; Masakazu Toi; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Performance characterization of a new high resolution PET scintillation detector.

Authors:  A Vandenbroucke; A M K Foudray; P D Olcott; C S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction.

Authors:  K R Zasadny; R L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging.

Authors:  Spencer L Bowen; Yibao Wu; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Lin Fu; Nathan J Packard; George W Burkett; Kai Yang; Karen K Lindfors; David K Shelton; Rosalie Hagge; Alexander D Borowsky; Steve R Martinez; Jinyi Qi; John M Boone; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.057

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Design study of a dedicated head and neck cancer PET system.

Authors:  Mohan Li; Brett Yockey; Shiva Abbaszadeh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-08

2.  Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Joseph Y Lo; Gregory M Sturgeon; Chengeng Zeng; Robert L Harrison; Paul E Kinahan; William Paul Segars
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-29

3.  Sparse Detector Configuration in SiPM Digital Photon Counting PET: a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Michelle I Knopp; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Simulation study of quantitative precision of the PET/X dedicated breast PET scanner.

Authors:  Chengeng Zeng; Paul E Kinahan; Hua Qian; Robert L Harrison; Kyle M Champley; Lawrence R MacDonald
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-30

5.  Image-based Modeling of PSF Deformation with Application to Limited Angle PET Data.

Authors:  Samuel Matej; Yusheng Li; Joseph Panetta; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 1.679

Review 6.  Update on time-of-flight PET imaging.

Authors:  Suleman Surti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Fourier rebinning and consistency equations for time-of-flight PET planograms.

Authors:  Yusheng Li; Michel Defrise; Samuel Matej; Scott D Metzler
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.407

Review 8.  Advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Design and performance of a high spatial resolution, time-of-flight PET detector.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Benjamin LeGeyt; Matthew E Werner; Madhuri Kaul; F M Newcomer; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.679

10.  Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Trevor Vent; Bruno Barufaldi; Andrew D A Maidment; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.