Literature DB >> 16689258

Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET.

Suleman Surti1, Joel S Karp, Lucretiu M Popescu, Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon, Matthew Werner.   

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine the benefit that can be achieved in image quality for a time-of-flight (TOF) fully three-dimensional (3-D) whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. We simulate a 3-D whole-body time-of-flight PET scanner with a complete modeling of spatial and energy resolutions. The scanner is based on LaBr3 Anger-logic detectors with which 300ps timing resolution has been achieved. Multiple simulations were performed for 70-cm long uniform cylinders with 27-cm and 35-cm diameters, containing hot spheres (22, 17, 13, and 10-mm diameter) in a central slice and 10-mm diameter hot spheres in a slice at 1/4 axial FOV. Image reconstruction was performed with a list-mode iterative TOF algorithm and data were analyzed after attenuation and scatter corrections for timing resolutions of 300, 600, 1000 ps and non-TOF for varying count levels. The results show that contrast recovery improves slightly with TOF (NEMA NU2-2001 analysis), and improved timing resolution leads to a faster convergence to the maximum contrast value. Detectability for 10-mm diameter hot spheres estimated using a nonprewhitening matched filter (NPW SNR) also improves nonlinearly with TOF. The gain in image quality using contrast and noise measures is proportional to the object diameter and inversely proportional to the timing resolution of the scanner. The gains in NPW SNR are smaller, but they also increase with increasing object diameter and improved timing resolution. The results show that scan times can be reduced in a TOF scanner to achieve images similar to those from a non-TOF scanner, or improved image quality achieved for same scan times.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16689258     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2006.871419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  46 in total

1.  Evaluation of Hamamatsu PET imaging modules for dedicated TOF-capable scanners.

Authors:  A Stolin; G Jaliparthi; R R Raylman; J Brefczynski-Lewis; S Majewski; J Qi; K Gong; S Dolinsky
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01-23

2.  Time-of-flight PET and PET/MRI: recurrent dreams or actual realities?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Impact of time-of-flight PET on whole-body oncologic studies: a human observer lesion detection and localization study.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joshua Scheuermann; Georges El Fakhri; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Ruth Lim; Nathalie Abi-Hatem; Elie Moussallem; Francois Benard; David Mankoff; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Novel detector technology for clinical PET.

Authors:  Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Exact and approximate Fourier rebinning of PET data from time-of-flight to non time-of-flight.

Authors:  Sanghee Cho; Sangtae Ahn; Quanzheng Li; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Analytical properties of time-of-flight PET data.

Authors:  Sanghee Cho; Sangtae Ahn; Quanzheng Li; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Optimization of time-of-flight reconstruction on Philips GEMINI TF.

Authors:  Stefaan Vandenberghe; Larry van Elmbt; Michel Guerchaft; Enrico Clementel; Jeroen Verhaeghe; Anne Bol; Ignace Lemahieu; Max Lonneux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.